Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to managedcode/dotPilot. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/managedcode/dotPilot/main/.codex/skills/mcaf-source-control/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/managedcode/dotPilotWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/managedcode/dotpilot/mcaf-source-control)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/managedcode/dotpilot/mcaf-source-control"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/managedcode/dotpilot/mcaf-source-control.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00050 | $0.00798 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00025 | $0.00399 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00160 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00080 |
Grade A, and why
mcaf-source-control scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
95% identical to dotnet-mcaf-source-control — 4 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 98 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
MCAF: Source Control
Trigger On
- bootstrapping source-control policy
- tightening branch, merge, or PR rules
- documenting commit or release hygiene
- dealing with secrets-in-git or repository structure issues
Value
- produce a concrete project delta: code, docs, config, tests, CI, or review artifact
- reduce ambiguity through explicit planning, verification, and final validation skills
- leave reusable project context so future tasks are faster and safer
Do Not Use For
- CI/CD workflow design with no source-control policy change
- one-off git commands that do not alter repo policy
Inputs
- current branching and merge flow
- release strategy and versioning expectations
- secret-handling and repository-structure constraints
Quick Start
- Read the nearest
AGENTS.mdand confirm scope and constraints. - Run this skill's
Workflowthrough theRalph Loopuntil outcomes are acceptable. - Return the
Required Result Formatwith concrete artifacts and verification evidence.
Workflow
- Agree on merge and release strategy before scaling implementation.
- Keep branch and PR rules explicit in-repo.
- Treat secrets in git history as a critical incident, not cleanup noise.
- Use concrete policy language, not hand-waving.
Deliver
- clear branch and merge strategy
- updated contribution or governance docs
- safer repository hygiene around commits, PRs, and secrets
Validate
- naming and merge rules are explicit
- release/versioning implications are documented where needed
- secret hygiene is treated as policy, not tribal knowledge
Ralph Loop
Use the Ralph Loop for every task, including docs, architecture, testing, and tooling work.
- Brainstorm first (mandatory):
- analyze current state
- define the problem, target outcome, constraints, and risks
- generate options and think through trade-offs before committing
- capture the recommended direction and open questions
- Plan second (mandatory):
- write a detailed execution plan from the chosen direction
- list final validation skills to run at the end, with order and reason
- Execute one planned step and produce a concrete delta.
- Review the result and capture findings with actionable next fixes.
- Apply fixes in small batches and rerun the relevant checks or review steps.
- Update the plan after each iteration.
- Repeat until outcomes are acceptable or only explicit exceptions remain.
- If a dependency is missing, bootstrap it or return
status: not_applicablewith explicit reason and fallback path.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 98 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A f44523d3ab39
mcaf-source-control is a skill published in the GitHub repository managedcode/dotPilot (23 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 798 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 95% identical to dotnet-mcaf-source-control, differing in 4 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
ship-change
Ship an OpenSpec change after openspec-apply completes. When only QA/manual tasks remain, marks them done (tested later), archives + syncs specs, commits, pushes, opens a PR against develop, watches CI, waits for CodeRabbit, auto-applies safe fixes and re-pushes, loops until CI green + no actionable review threads…
agency-jira-workflow-steward
Expert delivery operations specialist who enforces Jira-linked Git workflows, traceable commits, structured pull requests, and release-safe branch strategy across software teams.
git-integration
Git commit patterns, formats, and conventions for GSD methodology. Provides atomic commits per task, structured commit messages, planning file commits, branch management, and milestone tag operations.
git-wrapup
Land working-tree changes as logical commits — the work grouped by concern, topped by a release commit (version bump, changelog, regenerated artifacts) and an annotated tag. Verify, commit, tag. Stops at "committed and tagged locally" — no push, no publish. The release-and-publish skill picks up from here. Distilled…
release-cut
Cut a new pi-agent-dashboard release: promote ## [Unreleased] in CHANGELOG.md, bump every workspace package.json per SemVer, commit, tag v , and push — triggering the Release workflow that publishes every non-private workspace, builds the Electron artifacts, and creates a GitHub Release. Use on "cut a release"…
release-revoke
Revoke or rollback a pi-agent-dashboard release: delete the GitHub Release, remove the git tag locally and on origin, deprecate the npm version (npm unpublish is blocked after 72h), and optionally revert the release commit. Use when the user says "revoke release", "rollback release", "delete release", "unpublish…