Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add managedcode/MCAF --skill mcaf-testinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/managedcode/MCAFWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/managedcode/mcaf/mcaf-testing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/managedcode/mcaf/mcaf-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/managedcode/mcaf/mcaf-testing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/managedcode/mcaf/mcaf-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/managedcode/mcaf/mcaf-testing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.00489 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00196 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00098 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00049 |
Grade A, and why
mcaf-testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed CC-BY-4.0
The repository is licensed CC-BY-4.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago Changed · -89 lines · -22 tokens per session 34b39beada61
- 1mo ago First seen · 118 lines · 56 tokens per session scan A ed1d25f01c5e
mcaf-testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository managedcode/MCAF (56 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed CC-BY-4.0. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 489 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
google-agents-cli-eval
This skill should be used when the user wants to "run an evaluation", "evaluate my agent", "evaluate my ADK agent", "write an eval dataset", "analyze eval failures", "compare eval results", "optimize agent", or needs guidance on the Gemini platform eval methodology and the Quality Flywheel. Covers eval metrics…
adk-go-self-review
Review an ADK Go change the way a maintainer will — a fresh-context pass over the whole diff, five lenses (correctness and tests, scope, simplicity, style, adk-python parity), and the mutation check that proves your tests pin the change. Use before opening a PR, before any later push that changes code, and when asked…
ccg-workflow
How to run a non-trivial change end to end with the CCG role tools (ccganalyze / ccgdesign / ccgbuild / ccgdebug / ccgoptimize / ccgreview / ccgtest) and the verify- quality gates. Use when a task is a whole feature, a refactor, a bug whose cause is not yet known, or any change large enough that one straight-through…
red-team-review
Unified adversarial review, two modes. Strategic Matrix v4.3 (MTA-004) for arguments/plans/decisions: Priors → Rubric → Adversarial Lenses → SWOT/TOWS → MCDA → Blind Spot/Kill Switch → Summary. Deliverable Audit for built artefacts (assignments, reports, code outputs): isolated fresh-context hunt against the brief…
voice-agent-test-harness
Drive a fixed suite of spoken tests against a voice agent ("subject") from a co-located machine ("prober"), measure response latency / clarity / accuracy, diff against baseline, and report to the owner over Telegram.
bug-fixer
A bug reproduces, the expected behaviour is clear, and the fix stands apart from the current work.