Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/manalkaff/opendesign/wireframenpx skills add manalkaff/opendesign --skill wireframegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/manalkaff/opendesignWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00046 | $0.00568 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00284 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00114 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00057 |
Grade A, and why
wireframe scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 44 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Loaded when the user wants to explore the design space quickly — many rough ideas, not one polished direction.
Output location
Write all output files to ./opendesign/mockups/<task-slug>/. Derive the slug from the task name (e.g. dashboard-redesign, onboarding-flow).
Role framing
The goal is breadth, not polish. The output is a map of the design space, not a finished artifact. Use this skill early in a project, before the user has committed to a direction.
Interview the user first to understand the problem, then generate multiple rough takes in one pass.
Quantity and spread
- Produce 3 to 5 distinctly different approaches per idea. "Distinct" means different structural logic, not different colors of the same layout. If two wireframes could be swapped by changing a class, they are the same wireframe.
- Lay options out side by side so the user can compare them in one glance. For small sets, use a single canvas. For larger sets, use tabbed or paginated groupings so the comparison stays readable.
Visual style
- Low-fidelity, sketchy vibe. Handwritten-but-readable fonts (e.g. Caveat, Patrick Hand, Shadows Into Light, Kalam).
- Mostly black and white. Sparing color accents only to call out active or emphasized elements.
- Simple shapes: rectangles, lines, circles. No real imagery, no real icons. Placeholder text is fine and expected.
- No polished typography. No real brand colors. No hover states. These are thinking aids, not mockups.
Structure of each wireframe
- Focus on layout and flow. Where things sit, what reads as primary, what sequence the user moves through.
- Label sections clearly in plain language ("search bar", "filters", "results list", "primary action") so the user can discuss them without pointing.
- When a wireframe implies an interaction, annotate it with a short note. Do not implement it.
Tweaks and iteration
- Expose a small set of simple tweaks: toggle between variants, change density, swap an optional section in or out. Keep the tweak surface minimal. Wireframes should not compete with prototypes for fidelity.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 44 lines · 46 tokens per session scan A c162169cec63
wireframe is a skill published in the GitHub repository manalkaff/opendesign (255 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 46 tokens to every session and 568 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…