ck:coding-level

ck:coding-level is a skill for Claude Code from manhvann/codexkit. It costs 16 tokens per session (395 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A setting for choosing how much coding experience the agent should assume when explaining work, from no experience to expert level.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to set a coding level in the project configuration or choose a matching output style for future sessions.
Why use it?
It adjusts explanations and output to match the reader, including how much background, reasoning, and common-mistake guidance to include.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: argument-hint in frontmatter. Also seen: installed under .agents/ (shared by several agents); mentions Codex; $skill-name invocation.

Good fit Use it to set a coding level in the project configuration or choose a matching output style for future sessions.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/manhvann/codexkit/coding-level
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add manhvann/codexkit --skill coding-level
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/manhvann/codexkit

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for ck:coding-level

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/manhvann/codexkit/coding-level/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/manhvann/codexkit/coding-level)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/manhvann/codexkit/coding-level"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/manhvann/codexkit/coding-level/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for ck:coding-level

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/manhvann/codexkit/coding-level"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/manhvann/codexkit/coding-level.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 16 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 395 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00016 $0.00395
Opus 5.5 $0.00006 $0.00158
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00003 $0.00079
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00040

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 766bf64559b1, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

ck:coding-level scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.agents/skills/coding-level/SKILL.md · 57 lines

What it actually says

Coding Level

Set your coding experience level for tailored explanations and output format.

Usage

$coding-level [0-5]

Levels

Level Name Description
0 ELI5 Zero coding experience - analogies, no jargon, step-by-step
1 Junior 0-2 years - concepts explained, WHY not just HOW
2 Mid-Level 3-5 years - design patterns, system thinking
3 Senior 5-8 years - trade-offs, business context, architecture
4 Tech Lead 8-10 years - risk assessment, business impact, strategy
5 God Mode Expert - default behavior, maximum efficiency (default)

How It Works

  1. Set codingLevel in .codex/.ck.json
  2. Guidelines are automatically injected on every session start
  3. No manual activation needed - it just works!

Example

Set level 1 in .codex/.ck.json:

{
  "codingLevel": 1,
  ...
}

Next session, Codex will automatically:

  • Explain concepts and techniques clearly
  • Always explain WHY, not just HOW
  • Point out common mistakes
  • Add "Key Takeaways" after implementations

Optional: Manual Output Styles

For finer control, you can also use /output-style with these styles:

  • coding-level-0-eli5
  • coding-level-1-junior
  • coding-level-2-mid
  • coding-level-3-senior
  • coding-level-4-lead
  • coding-level-5-god
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 57 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A 766bf64559b1

Subscribe to this mod's changes

ck:coding-level is a skill published in the GitHub repository manhvann/codexkit (89 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 395 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.