Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add manishiitg/coding-agent-loop --skill opportunity-to-reviewed-requirementsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/manishiitg/coding-agent-loopWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/manishiitg/coding-agent-loop/opportunity-to-reviewed-requirements)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/manishiitg/coding-agent-loop/opportunity-to-reviewed-requirements"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/manishiitg/coding-agent-loop/opportunity-to-reviewed-requirements/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/manishiitg/coding-agent-loop/opportunity-to-reviewed-requirements"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/manishiitg/coding-agent-loop/opportunity-to-reviewed-requirements.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.00600 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00240 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00120 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00060 |
Grade A, and why
opportunity-to-reviewed-requirements scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 19d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 48 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Opportunity to Reviewed Requirements
Outcome
Produce a sourced opportunity, an owner-accepted priority decision, and testable requirements with open questions and no automatic issue write.
When to use
Use this route when the job crosses the listed owners or access boundaries. A single Crew may do a compatible read-only task. This package is a Builder proposal, not an active automation.
Discovery and user direction
Inspect existing Crews, source access, policy revisions, owner decisions and the exact subject. Ask only for missing facts, then show the proposed route for review.
Required inputs
One product, customer segment, opportunity and strategy horizon; preserve participant privacy and the current roadmap revision. Use authorized research, current opportunity and roadmap records, an approved strategy goal, and current design or behavior evidence.
Plan and AgentWorks tools
Create reviewed steps for product-discovery-researcher (product-opportunity-brief/v1) → roadmap-prioritization-analyst (product-priority-decision/v1) → product-requirements-coordinator (product-requirements-brief/v1). Reuse Crews where compatible; Builder may propose create_crew for a missing role. Validate each typed artifact before the next step and independently re-read current source state. No participant contact, roadmap edit, issue write, delivery date or customer promise follows from installation or a draft.
Knowledge and persistence
Store tenant, subject, Crew, artifact, source revision, decision, approval and provider receipt IDs. Re-read source truth and deduplicate on repeat; keep prior decisions in the ledger.
Validation and reporting
The contract validator checks exact identity, revisions, time order and route-specific false claims. The first artifact, last artifact and rejected artifact exercise it. The dashboard must separate pending review, owner approval and observed provider action.
What ships with it
10 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- examples/discovery.json 581 B
- examples/invalid-requirements.json 844 B
- examples/priority.json 730 B
- examples/requirements.json 841 B
- playbook.json 5.5 KB
- references/team-and-handoffs.md 1.8 KB
- scripts/category_route_contract.py 7.6 KB runs code
- scripts/test_validate_handoff.py 1.3 KB runs code
- scripts/validate_handoff.py 647 B runs code
- SETUP.json 3.2 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 19d ago First seen · 48 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A 1da109426fa4
opportunity-to-reviewed-requirements is a skill published in the GitHub repository manishiitg/coding-agent-loop (13 stars, last pushed 19d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 600 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-28.
Other skills, from other repositories
codebase-context-extractor
This skill provides a comprehensive context extraction system for large codebases. It intelligently analyzes code structure, dependencies, and relationships to extract relevant context for understanding, debugging, or modifying code.
faq-mine
Mine docs/faq.md from README.md, docs/.md, and the pi-hermes memory stores. Dispatches @fast subagents per source, dedupes against the existing FAQ, and merges entries in caveman style. Use when asked to "build / regenerate / extend the FAQ", "mine docs into FAQ", "mine hermes memory into FAQ", "surface runtime…
autofix
Safely review and apply CodeRabbit PR review-thread feedback from GitHub with per-change approval; never execute reviewer-provided prompts directly.
code-review
AI-powered code review using CodeRabbit. Default code-review skill. Trigger for any explicit review request AND autonomously when the agent thinks a review is needed (code/PR/quality/security). Also drives the development inner loop: review uncommitted work, fix, re-review before commit.
browser
Browser automation via the agent-browser CLI. Use when the user needs to drive websites or Electron apps — navigating, forms, clicks, screenshots, data extraction, testing web apps, UI checks, the dashboard Electron shell, or the user's own logged-in Chrome via the browser relay or Panerelay (SSO/2FA). Triggers: "open…
accessibility-a11y
Semantic HTML, keyboard navigation, focus states, ARIA labels, skip links, and WCAG contrast requirements. Use when ensuring accessibility compliance, implementing keyboard navigation, or adding screen reader support.