support-case-to-reviewed-resolution

support-case-to-reviewed-resolution is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from manishiitg/coding-agent-loop. It costs 27 tokens per session (693 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A support-case workflow that triages one customer issue, drafts a sourced reply, and can route an approved escalation.

In plain words
What is it for?
It helps classify a case, use approved help content, assign an owner, prepare a reply, and track escalation or closure evidence.
Why use it?
It keeps a drafted response, approved response, message delivery, and actual problem resolution as separate facts instead of assuming one proves the next.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit It helps classify a case, use approved help content, assign an owner, prepare a reply, and track escalation or closure evidence.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/manishiitg/coding-agent-loop/support-case-to-reviewed-resolution
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add manishiitg/coding-agent-loop --skill support-case-to-reviewed-resolution
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/manishiitg/coding-agent-loop

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for support-case-to-reviewed-resolution

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/manishiitg/coding-agent-loop/support-case-to-reviewed-resolution/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/manishiitg/coding-agent-loop/support-case-to-reviewed-resolution)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/manishiitg/coding-agent-loop/support-case-to-reviewed-resolution"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/manishiitg/coding-agent-loop/support-case-to-reviewed-resolution/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for support-case-to-reviewed-resolution

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/manishiitg/coding-agent-loop/support-case-to-reviewed-resolution"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/manishiitg/coding-agent-loop/support-case-to-reviewed-resolution.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 27 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 693 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00027 $0.00693
Opus 5.5 $0.00011 $0.00277
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00005 $0.00139
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00069

Measured 20d ago against content hash 923e99f4842f, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

support-case-to-reviewed-resolution scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 20d ago.

The scan reads SKILL.md. This mod also ships 2 executable files (scripts/test_validate_handoff.py, scripts/validate_handoff.py), listed below but not scanned — reading those needs a real analyzer, not pattern matching.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

playbooks/agentic-engineering-platform/customer-support/support-case-to-reviewed-resolution/SKILL.md · 48 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 48 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Support Case to Reviewed Resolution

Outcome

Route one authorized customer case to an owned, sourced response or escalation. A drafted reply, approved reply, provider delivery, and observed resolution are separate states.

When to use

Use when a support team has a real case source, current approved help content, a contact owner, and a priority policy. Start with one manual case. Feedback theme analysis is a separate route.

Discovery and user direction

Inspect existing Support Crews, case and thread history, known incident state, help sources, prior contact, owners, and provider access. Propose reuse or reviewed creation. Show the exact case route before Builder applies it; selection leaves setup pending.

Required inputs

Bind tenant, case, account, recipient, channel, current thread revision, owner, priority rules, approved source revisions, and any escalation policy. Record who may approve contact and what source proves case closure.

Plan and AgentWorks tools

Reuse Support Triage Assistant and Support Reply Drafter; add Escalation Coordinator for a distinct receiving owner or boundary. Triage writes support-case-triage/v1; run the bundled validator before Reply or Escalation consumes it. Reply writes an unsent support-reply-draft/v1. Escalation writes support-escalation-brief/v1 with accepted owner state; validate it before Reply uses its claims. Insert explicit validator steps in the Workflow. Send only through a separately authorized action after exact approval and a fresh prior-contact check.

Knowledge and persistence

Save tenant, case, account, thread revision, source revisions, run, draft, approval, message fingerprint, delivery receipt, and outcome IDs. Re-read current case and thread before retries or scheduled runs; skip duplicate sends.

Validation and reporting

The validator checks joins, source evidence, draft state, escalation acceptance, delivery receipt, and observed closure. Fictional triage, reply, escalation, delivery, and outcome illustrate valid stages; the unsupported reply fails. The reporting dashboard shows queued, awaiting review, escalated, delivered, observed resolved, and blocked separately with source links and cost.

Read the full file on GitHub · 48 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 20d ago First seen · 48 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A 923e99f4842f

Subscribe to this mod's changes

support-case-to-reviewed-resolution is a skill published in the GitHub repository manishiitg/coding-agent-loop (13 stars, last pushed 19d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 693 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-27.