Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add manu14357/zskills --skill azure-computegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/manu14357/zskillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/manu14357/zskills/azure-compute)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/manu14357/zskills/azure-compute"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/manu14357/zskills/azure-compute/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/manu14357/zskills/azure-compute"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/manu14357/zskills/azure-compute.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00050 | $0.02418 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00025 | $0.01209 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00484 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00242 |
Grade A, and why
azure-compute scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 262 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Azure Compute
Choose the compute option with the lowest operational burden that meets your workload's functional and non-functional requirements. Managed services first; IaaS only when control is mandatory.
Use This Skill When
- The user asks which Azure compute service to use (Functions vs. App Service vs. AKS)
- A workload must move from on-premises or another cloud to Azure
- The user needs trade-off analysis: cost, scaling, latency, compliance
- The user needs operational readiness assessment
Context: Compute Maturity Spectrum
Serverless (Least ops):
Azure Functions
└─ Pro: Zero infrastructure, auto-scale, pay-per-exec
└─ Con: Cold starts, max 10-min timeout, limited languages
PaaS (Low ops):
App Service
└─ Pro: Built-in scaling, diagnostics, deployment slots
└─ Con: Single-region, limited customization
Container Apps
└─ Pro: Container-native, auto-scaling, event-driven
└─ Con: Smaller ecosystem, newer service
Containers + Orchestration:
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
└─ Pro: Full Kubernetes control, multi-region, custom scaling
└─ Con: Requires Kubernetes expertise, higher operational burden
IaaS (Most control, Most ops):
Virtual Machines / VMSS
└─ Pro: OS-level control, custom binaries, legacy support
└─ Con: Requires manual patching, scaling, monitoring
Required Inputs
- Workload type: Web API, background job, ML training, legacy app, real-time analytics
- Traffic pattern: Constant, bursty, seasonal, event-driven
- Latency requirement: Sub-100ms, <500ms, or flexible
- Availability: 99%, 99.9%, 99.95%?
- Scaling needs: Min/max instances, target response time
- Compliance: On-premises only, specific regions, data residency
- Team skills: DevOps, Kubernetes expertise, vendor lock-in tolerance
- Budget: TCO vs. OpEx preference
Decision Tree
Is this a background job triggered by an event (file upload, message queue, timer)?
├─ Yes → Azure Functions (lowest cost, auto-scale, easy)
│ But if: Job runs >10 min → Container Apps or App Service
└─ No → Continue
Is this a stateless HTTP API or web app?
├─ Yes → App Service (built-in scaling, diagnostics)
│ Or: Container Apps (if containerized, multi-region)
├─ Needs Kubernetes → AKS
└─ No → Continue
Does this need OS-level control (custom packages, specific kernel version)?
├─ Yes → Virtual Machines or VMSS
└─ No → One of above managed options
Is latency critical (< 100ms p99)?
├─ Yes → Consider colocating compute with data store (same region/AZ)
│ Evaluate: App Service Plan, VMSS, or Container Apps with CPU optimization
└─ No → Standard deployment acceptable
Do you need to orchestrate multiple microservices?
├─ Yes → AKS (service mesh, traffic mgmt, multi-region)
│ Or: App Service + API Management (simpler, less overhead)
└─ No → Single-service option (Functions, App Service)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 262 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A 16e364875966
azure-compute is a skill published in the GitHub repository manu14357/zskills (16 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 2,418 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…