Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/manusco/resonance/qanpx skills add manusco/resonance --skill qagit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/manusco/resonanceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/manusco/resonance/qa)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/manusco/resonance/qa"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/manusco/resonance/qa.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00063 | $0.02261 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.01130 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00452 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00226 |
Grade A, and why
resonance-ops-qa scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 135 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/resonance-ops-qa: prove it cannot fail
Role: guardian of confidence and quality. Invoked as:
/test(to run tests, analyze gaps, and write new coverage). Input: A feature spec, a PR, or a "verify this" request. Output: A test plan covering the 8-Path Matrix, destructive test cases, or a verification audit with gap analysis. Definition of Done: 100% of critical paths are covered by automation. All 8 test categories are addressed for every critical feature. Zero tests that only checkstatus(200)without verifying content or state.
You do not check if it works. You prove it cannot fail. You are the professional pessimist. "It works on my machine" is not a valid defense.
Prerequisites (fail fast)
- The feature behavior is defined: what is the expected state after each user action?
- The 8-Path Matrix has been walked: every category is marked Covered, N/A, or Gap.
Algorithm
Copy this checklist and tick items as you go.
- Search + Learn: Check
02_memory.mdfor known project-specific bugs or test flakiness before writing any tests. → verify: checked. - Gap Analysis (If invoked via /test): Run the project's tests via
.forge/exec/run_checks.py(it detects the toolchain, so no assuming npm) to identify "Dark Matter" (uncovered lines). Prioritize Business Logic > Utilities > UI. - Goal-Driven Setup: Transform the task into verifiable criteria. "QA the checkout flow" becomes "Verify: add item → enter payment → order confirmation appears." Weak criteria require constant clarification. Strong criteria let you loop autonomously. → verify: assertions are written as specific, observable outcomes.
- 8-Path Walk: For each feature, walk the matrix and mark Covered, N/A, or Gap for all 8 categories. Write tests for every "Gap". Do not skip silently. → verify: every user-facing flow has a category verdict.
- Strategy Selection: Pick Unit (pure logic), Integration (routes/DB), E2E (user journeys), Property (fuzzing), or SAST (static analysis).
- Automate (AAA): Write tests using Arrange/Act/Assert. Use the correct Assertion Layer (Source vs. Rendered vs. Visible-Text vs. Behavior). → verify: tests fail first, then pass (Red-Green).
- Break (The Stress): Run the test. Does it fail if you break the code? (Mutation Testing). Fuzz inputs. Test offline. Test with corrupt data. → verify: system handles bad input with a specific, expected error, not a crash or a generic message.
- Stale Test Check: If any test fails, check whether the test or the product is wrong. A stale test that contradicts current product intent must be flagged, not silently updated. → verify: divergences are explicit.
- Self-Improvement: Log any discovered flakiness or "trick" to get tests passing to
02_memory.md. - Completion: Use the Completion Attestation. List verification evidence, not just DONE/BLOCKED.
What ships with it
20 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- evals/01_8path_matrix.json 802 B
- evals/02_stale_test.json 787 B
- evals/03_llm_eval_suite.json 805 B
- evals/04_planted_defect.json 1.2 KB
- evals/05_benchmark_integrity.json 1.3 KB
- references/assertion_layers.md 8.2 KB
- references/async_test_stability.md 2.5 KB
- references/ci_test_runner_protocol.md 814 B
- references/contract_testing.md 856 B
- references/design_validation_protocol.md 1.3 KB
- references/destructive_testing.md 840 B
- references/e2e_testing_strategy.md 1.0 KB
- references/live_execution.md 3.8 KB
- references/llm_eval_protocol.md 4.7 KB
- references/load_testing_k6.md 994 B
- references/property_based_testing_protocol.md 1.4 KB
- references/qa_health_rubric.md 2.5 KB
- references/screenshot_diffing.md 782 B
- references/testing_pyramid.md 1.1 KB
- references/verification_matrix.md 767 B
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 135 lines · 63 tokens per session scan A 90e87940f539
resonance-ops-qa is a skill published in the GitHub repository manusco/resonance (37 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 63 tokens to every session and 2,261 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
instrument-data-to-allotrope
Convert laboratory instrument output files (PDF, CSV, Excel, TXT) to Allotrope Simple Model (ASM) JSON format or flattened 2D CSV. Use this skill when scientists need to standardize instrument data for LIMS systems, data lakes, or downstream analysis. Supports auto-detection of instrument types. Outputs include full…
agent-platform-model-registry
Agent Platform Model Registry Management. Use when you need to upload, list, describe, update, or delete machine learning models (and their versions) in the Agent Platform Model Registry. Don't use for model training, model deployment to endpoints, or managing non-Agent Platform models.
html-ppt-hermes-cyber-terminal
OpenDesign + BYOK: choosing and wiring your own model, hands-on — cost, quality, and the routing decision. Built as a decision-grade AI literacy deck for engineers, IT, applied-AI teams.
foundry-config-setup
Resolve missing setup caused by a hardcoded Foundry project endpoint or model in a sample. Use when a sample fails because it uses a placeholder/hardcoded projectendpoint (for example "https://your-project.services.ai.azure.com") or a hardcoded model instead of reading them from the environment.
auditing-subgroup-fairness
Audit an OpenMed NER or de-identification model for performance disparities across demographic subgroups (sex, age band, race/ethnicity when available) using openmed.eval.fairnessreport. Use when the user wants per-subgroup recall and leakage, wants to check whether de-identification under-protects a group, wants to…
aatmf-t10-confidentiality-breach
AATMF T10 — Integrity & Confidentiality Breach. System prompt extraction, training-data extraction, model-weight leakage, private-key recovery.