Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to maoxx241/vllm-ascend-workspace. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/maoxx241/vllm-ascend-workspace/main/.agents/skills/vllm-ascend-correctness-validation/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/maoxx241/vllm-ascend-workspaceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/maoxx241/vllm-ascend-workspace/vllm-ascend-correctness-validation)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/maoxx241/vllm-ascend-workspace/vllm-ascend-correctness-validation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/maoxx241/vllm-ascend-workspace/vllm-ascend-correctness-validation/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/maoxx241/vllm-ascend-workspace/vllm-ascend-correctness-validation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/maoxx241/vllm-ascend-workspace/vllm-ascend-correctness-validation.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00110 | $0.00948 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00055 | $0.00474 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00190 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00095 |
Grade A, and why
vllm-ascend-correctness-validation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 74 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
vLLM Ascend Correctness Validation
Produce traceable correctness evidence instead of treating a successful request as proof of correctness.
Workflow
- Define cases and the smallest affected validation matrix.
- Create independent baseline and candidate code states or eager and graph states.
- Before remote execution, use
remote-code-parityfor each state. - For offline cases, run
scripts/remote_correctness_harness.pyinside the remote NPU container. The harness prioritizes the materializedvllm/andvllm-ascend/source roots and propagates them throughPYTHONPATH, so launching from/vllm-workspaceor spawning apython -mchild cannot resolve the outer repository directory as a falsevllmnamespace package. - For online cases, use
vllm-ascend-serving, then run the same harness inonline-chatmode. - Use
scripts/correctness_run.py initto create the run directory and Run Manifest v1. - Use
scripts/correctness_run.py compareto normalize the evidence into a classification and report. - Route failures:
- eager pass and graph fail:
vllm-ascend-graph-debug; - multi-rank hang or inconsistent rank metadata:
vllm-ascend-distributed-debugwhen available; - performance-only change:
vllm-ascend-performance-regressionwhen available; - task metric execution: use the bundled AISBench adapter.
- eager pass and graph fail:
Do not run the full execution-mode, parallelism, and feature Cartesian product. Select cases from the code impact and .agents/knowledge/validation-rules.yaml; record omitted combinations as risks.
Determinism
For exact token or text comparison:
- set
temperature=0; - set an explicit seed;
- keep prompts, messages, chat template, max tokens, model weights, tokenizer, parallel topology, and feature flags identical;
- repeat each case at least twice when nondeterminism is suspected;
- never compare baseline and candidate results produced from different case files.
Use task-level metrics when exact output is not an appropriate acceptance condition. Use numeric tolerances only for explicitly captured logits, hidden states, KV samples, or other numeric evidence.
What ships with it
9 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- agents/openai.yaml 265 B
- references/acceptance.md 1.5 KB
- references/aisbench.md 2.1 KB
- references/behavior.md 3.2 KB
- references/command-recipes.md 1.8 KB
- scripts/aisbench_adapter.py 13 KB runs code
- scripts/correctness_run.py 26 KB runs code
- scripts/remote_correctness_harness.py 11 KB runs code
- tests/test_correctness.py 11 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 74 lines · 110 tokens per session scan A 6679939c999b
vllm-ascend-correctness-validation is a skill published in the GitHub repository maoxx241/vllm-ascend-workspace (36 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 110 tokens to every session and 948 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
research-engineer
An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.
tika-eval-compare
Compare extracts from two Tika builds over a corpus to detect regressions in content, encoding, exceptions, and embedded-document handling. Use for "compare before/after extracts", "eval this change against the corpus".
neuron-evaluation-engineer
Create and run AI evaluations with datasets, assertions, and output drivers in Neuron AI. Use this skill whenever the user mentions evaluation, testing AI systems, creating evaluators, dataset-driven testing, assertion-based validation, or wants to measure AI system performance. Also trigger for tasks involving…
jetson-validate-image
Use after jetson-flash-image to run static BSP checks, on-target smoke/regression tests on a flashed DUT, or both. Not for build or flash steps. Triggers: validate bsp, on-target validation.
atmos-validation
Validate Atmos projects, components, arbitrary JSON Schema inputs, EditorConfig, and GitHub Actions; use affected-file selection and native CI annotations.
skill-benchmark
Benchmark AI skill effectiveness by measuring implementation quality against legacy constraints.