Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add mappedsky/seizu --skill delete-reportsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mappedsky/seizuWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mappedsky/seizu/delete-reports)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mappedsky/seizu/delete-reports"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mappedsky/seizu/delete-reports/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mappedsky/seizu/delete-reports"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mappedsky/seizu/delete-reports.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00051 | $0.00691 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00276 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00138 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00069 |
Grade A, and why
delete-reports scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Delete a Seizu report for the request the request input carries.
Inputs — the values arrive in the ## Inputs block below these instructions:
request— the deletion to make and why.target_report_id— the report to delete, if known.report_name— the report's name, when the id is not known.dry_run— when true, produce the payload without deleting anything.
Tool arguments - use exactly these field names and no others:
- reports__list: no arguments
- reports__get: report_id
- reports__list_versions: report_id
- reports__delete: report_id
Deletion rules:
- A delete removes the report and all of its versions, and cannot be undone. There is no restore, so identify the report before calling anything.
- Delete exactly one report per request unless the user has named several. Never widen a request into a cleanup of everything that looks similar.
reports__deleteis confirmation-gated: the call returns an approval request rather than deleting. Say so plainly and tell the user to approve it in the chat's confirmations panel. That is the expected path, not a failure, and not a reason to look for another way to remove the report.- A pinned report, or the one the dashboard points at, may refuse deletion. Report the refusal and what would have to change first; do not unpin or repoint the dashboard unless the user asks.
Workflow:
- If
target_report_idis empty, callreports__listand identify the report fromreport_nameand the request. If more than one matches, or none does, ask for the exact report and stop. - Call
reports__getand confirm the report's name, latest version and access scope. Say what is about to be destroyed, naming the report rather than only its id. - Call
reports__list_versionsand state how many versions go with it. - If
dry_run=true, stop here and show the exactreports__deletepayload. - If
dry_run=false, callreports__deletewithreport_id. Report the approval request if one comes back, and after it is approved confirm the deletion. - Verify by calling
reports__getfor the same id; a deleted report is gone.
Output format:
Target: report_id, name, access scope, latest version, version count.Impact: what the deletion destroys, and anything that blocks it.Applied Changes: thereports__deletecall and its result, or the dry-run payload, or the approval that is waiting.Verification: evidence the report is gone.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 56 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A c885f033ea69
delete-reports is a skill published in the GitHub repository mappedsky/seizu (5 stars, last pushed 16d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 51 tokens to every session and 691 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-11.
Other skills, from other repositories
gsd-tools
Central utility skill for GSD operations. Provides config parsing, slug generation, timestamps, path operations, and orchestrates calls to other specialized skills. Acts as the unified entry point that the original gsd-tools.cjs provided via its lib/ modules (commands, config, core, init).
babysit-babysitter-issues
This skill should be used when the user asks to "babysit issues", "work on assigned issues", "check a5c-agent issues", "process babysitter issues", or wants to find and work on open GitHub issues assigned to a5c-agent in the babysitter repo.
spec-driven-development
Specification creation and management for the Pilot Shell methodology. Covers semantic search, clarifying questions, structured spec generation, and iterative refinement.
cog-meeting-processing
Process meeting recordings and transcripts into decisions, action items, and team dynamics.
cog-onboarding
Personalize COG Second Brain workflow through role pack selection and vault initialization.
cog-team-intelligence
Cross-reference GitHub, Linear, Slack, and PostHog with bidirectional sync for team briefs.