dependency-provenance

dependency-provenance is a skill for Claude Code from mappedsky/seizu. It costs 59 tokens per session (857 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A package-source investigation tool that checks registry records to find where an installed software package comes from and what other package requires it. A transitive dependency is a package installed because another package needs it, rather than one your code imports directly.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to investigate vulnerable packages, version pins, compatibility, and indirect dependency paths across common package ecosystems.
Why use it?
It replaces guesses about package versions, compatibility ranges, and indirect dependencies with evidence from package registries.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter.

Good fit Use it to investigate vulnerable packages, version pins, compatibility, and indirect dependency paths across common package ecosystems.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/mappedsky/seizu/dependency-provenance
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add mappedsky/seizu --skill dependency-provenance
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mappedsky/seizu

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for dependency-provenance

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mappedsky/seizu/dependency-provenance/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mappedsky/seizu/dependency-provenance)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mappedsky/seizu/dependency-provenance"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mappedsky/seizu/dependency-provenance/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for dependency-provenance

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mappedsky/seizu/dependency-provenance"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mappedsky/seizu/dependency-provenance.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 59 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 857 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00059 $0.00857
Opus 5.5 $0.00024 $0.00343
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00012 $0.00171
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00086

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 820d5d715b1f, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

dependency-provenance scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.config/dev/seizu/plugins/cve-response/skills/dependency-provenance/SKILL.md · 39 lines

What it actually says

Establish, from registry metadata, how the package input at the version input relates to the target input, in the ecosystem the ecosystem input names.

This is the one question the security graph cannot answer. The graph records which versions are installed and which fall in a CVE's vulnerable range. It does not record what a package declares it needs — there is no node or edge saying one package requires a range of another. Neither can the sandbox look it up: it has no network egress and no DNS. The ext__deps__depsdev_* tools are the only source. Never state a version pin, a compatibility range, or a transitive relationship from memory; if these tools cannot answer it, say so instead.

Tool arguments — use exactly these field names:

  • ext__deps__depsdev_find_dependency_path: system, name, version, target
  • ext__deps__depsdev_get_requirements: system, name, version
  • ext__deps__depsdev_get_dependencies: system, name, version
  • ext__deps__depsdev_get_version: system, name, version
  • github_security__repo_dependencies: repos, packages, manifest

system is the ecosystem in lower case: npm, cargo, maven, pypi, go, nuget, rubygems.

How to work:

  1. When a target package is named, start with ext__deps__depsdev_find_dependency_path. It answers "does this pull that in, and by what chain" directly and returns a short path rather than a graph. "pulls_in": false is an answer, not a failed lookup — report it as "not pulled in" and stop.
  2. When no target is named, or you need the declared constraints, use ext__deps__depsdev_get_requirements. It returns what the version declares, per ecosystem, with any environment markers.
  3. Reach for ext__deps__depsdev_get_dependencies only when you need the whole resolved graph — it runs to hundreds of nodes. Prefer the path tool.
  4. ext__deps__depsdev_get_version adds licences, attestations and the advisory keys recorded against that exact version.
  5. Where the installed version is what matters, take it from github_security__repo_dependencies — that is what the scan actually found — and use deps.dev for what it requires.

Two things that look like errors and are not:

  • Resolved graphs exist only for npm, cargo, maven and pypi. For go, nuget and rubygems the requirements tool works but the path and graph tools refuse. That is a real limit; report it rather than treating the absence as "nothing depends on it".
  • Declared requirements and the resolved graph can disagree. botocore may declare urllib3 <1.27 and still resolve to urllib3 2.7.0, because the declaration carries an environment marker and another line covers other environments. Read the marker before calling it a contradiction.

Report:

  • The relationship in one line: pulled in or not, direct or transitive, and the chain with the constraint on each hop.
  • The constraint that decided it, quoted from the tool output.
  • What you could not determine, and why — an unsupported ecosystem, a version deps.dev does not know, a chain that stops short. Cite the tool each fact came from. Do not fill a gap with a remembered version history.
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 39 lines · 59 tokens per session scan A 820d5d715b1f

Subscribe to this mod's changes

dependency-provenance is a skill published in the GitHub repository mappedsky/seizu (5 stars, last pushed 16d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 59 tokens to every session and 857 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-11.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

tutti-agent-workspace-app

Build or evolve a complex agent-enabled Tutti workspace app repository. Use for Tutti apps with web/server/shared monorepos, @tutti-os/agent-acp-kit local agent runtimes, kit-owned TUTTICLI agent/composer discovery, dynamic agent catalogs, run-scoped MCP tool gateways, app-owned package builders, web-first debugging…

tutti-os/tutti · 106 tokens

assimilate-popular-workflows

This skill should be used when the user asks to "find skills in the wild", "assimilate popular workflows", "discover SKILL.md files in repos", "research external skills", "find workflow patterns", "survey the skill landscape", "what skills exist out there", or wants to investigate public repositories for extractable…

a5c-ai/babysitter · 110 tokens

mcp-app-verification

Comprehensive verification checklists for MCP Apps. Tests with basic-host reference, validates handler-before-connect, text fallback, resource URI linking, single-file bundling, host styling, CSP, and legacy pattern detection.

a5c-ai/babysitter · 48 tokens

mcp-host-styling-integration

Integrates MCP App UI with host theming system. Applies host CSS variables, handles onhostcontextchanged, safe area insets, display mode detection, and fullscreen configuration.

a5c-ai/babysitter · 44 tokens

verification-suite

Plan structure validation, phase completeness checks, reference integrity verification, and artifact existence confirmation. Provides the structured verification layer ensuring GSD artifacts are well-formed and complete.

a5c-ai/babysitter · 36 tokens

guardrails-ai-setup

Guardrails AI validation framework setup for LLM applications. Implement input/output validation, safety checks, and structured output enforcement.

a5c-ai/babysitter · 30 tokens