Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add marcelorodrigo/agent-skills --skill create-prgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/marcelorodrigo/agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/marcelorodrigo/agent-skills/create-pr)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/marcelorodrigo/agent-skills/create-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/marcelorodrigo/agent-skills/create-pr/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/marcelorodrigo/agent-skills/create-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/marcelorodrigo/agent-skills/create-pr.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00026 | $0.01173 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00469 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00235 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00117 |
Grade A, and why
create-pr scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 190 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Create Pull Request
Create pull requests following the best engineering practices.
Requires: GitHub CLI (gh) authenticated and available.
Prerequisites
Before creating a PR, ensure all changes are committed. If there are uncommitted changes, run the commit skill skill({ name: "conventional-commit" }) first to commit them properly.
# Check for uncommitted changes
git status --porcelain
If the output shows any uncommitted changes (modified, added, or untracked files that should be included), invoke the commit skill skill({ name: "conventional-commit" }) before proceeding.
Process
Step 1: Verify Branch State
# Detect the default branch
BASE=$(gh repo view --json defaultBranchRef --jq '.defaultBranchRef.name')
# Check current branch and status
git status
git log $BASE..HEAD --oneline
Ensure:
- All changes are committed
- Branch is up to date with remote
- Changes are rebased on the base branch if needed
Step 2: Analyze Changes
Review what will be included in the PR:
# See all commits that will be in the PR
git log $BASE..HEAD
# See the full diff
git diff $BASE...HEAD
Understand the scope and purpose of all changes before writing the description.
Step 3: Write the PR Description
Use this structure for PR descriptions (ignoring any repository PR templates):
<brief description of what the PR does>
<why these changes are being made - the motivation>
<alternative approaches considered, if any>
<any additional context reviewers need>
Do NOT include:
- "Test plan" sections
- Checkbox lists of testing steps
- Redundant summaries of the diff
Do include:
- Clear explanation of what and why
- Links to relevant issues or tickets (only if available)
- Context that isn't obvious from the code
- Notes on specific areas that need careful review
Step 4: Create the PR
gh pr create --title "<type>(<scope>): <description>" --body "
<description body here>
"
Title format follows commit conventions:
feat(scope): Add new featurefix(scope): Fix the bugrefactor(scope): Refactor something
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 190 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A 3852d11c30f4
create-pr is a skill published in the GitHub repository marcelorodrigo/agent-skills (19 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 1,173 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
pr
Draft a PR body from OMC's paper trail — the smallest visual that proves the change, evidence consumed from the verify protocol (never re-collected), reversibility from the ADR test on the diff, glossary language throughout.
merge-batch
Prepare and merge an owner-selected PR batch with contributor credit and exact-candidate admission. Use for a pasted PR list; combined focused validation is diagnostic, and every actual landing still requires its applicable checks and authorization.
otto-pr-review-loop
Run Polly and OCR on a PR until all findings settle.
engram-branch-pr
PR creation workflow for Engram following the issue-first enforcement system. Trigger: When creating a pull request, opening a PR, or preparing changes for review.
github-contributor
A step-by-step guide for contributing code, tests, documentation, or build changes to open-source projects you do not maintain. It explains how to prepare a pull request that follows the project’s rules and is easier for maintainers to review.
revdiff
Review diffs, files, and documents with inline annotations in a TUI overlay, or answer questions about revdiff usage, configuration, themes, and keybindings. Opens revdiff in agterm/tmux/zellij/herdr/kitty/wezterm/cmux/ghostty/iterm2/emacs-vterm, captures annotations, and addresses them. Works in git, hg, and jj repos…