Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add marchatton/agent-skills --skill validate-evaluatorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/marchatton/agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/marchatton/agent-skills/validate-evaluator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/marchatton/agent-skills/validate-evaluator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/marchatton/agent-skills/validate-evaluator.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00069 | $0.02260 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00034 | $0.01130 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00452 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00226 |
Grade A, and why
validate-evaluator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
94% identical to validate-evaluator — 19 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 213 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Validate Evaluator
Calibrate an LLM judge against human judgment.
Overview
- Split human-labeled data into train (10-20%), dev (40-45%), test (40-45%)
- Run judge on dev set and measure TPR/TNR
- Iterate on the judge until TPR and TNR > 90% on dev set
- Run once on held-out test set for final TPR/TNR
- Apply bias correction formula to production data
Prerequisites
- A built LLM judge prompt (from write-judge-prompt)
- Human-labeled data: ~100 traces with binary Pass/Fail labels per failure mode
- Aim for ~50 Pass and ~50 Fail (balanced, even if real distribution is skewed)
- Labels must come from a domain expert, not outsourced annotators
- Candidate few-shot examples from your labeled data
Core Instructions
Step 1: Create Data Splits
Split human-labeled data into three disjoint sets:
| Split | Size | Purpose | Rules |
|---|---|---|---|
| Training | 10-20% (~10-20 examples) | Source of few-shot examples for the judge prompt | Only clear-cut Pass and Fail cases. Used directly in the prompt. |
| Dev | 40-45% (~40-45 examples) | Iterative evaluator refinement | Never include in the prompt. Evaluate against repeatedly. |
| Test | 40-45% (~40-45 examples) | Final unbiased accuracy measurement | Do NOT look at during development. Used once at the end. |
Target: 30-50 examples of each class (Pass and Fail) across dev and test combined. Use balanced splits even if real-world prevalence is skewed — you need enough Fail examples to measure TNR reliably.
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split
# First split: separate test set
train_dev, test = train_test_split(
labeled_data, test_size=0.4, stratify=labeled_data['label'], random_state=42
)
# Second split: separate training examples from dev set
train, dev = train_test_split(
train_dev, test_size=0.75, stratify=train_dev['label'], random_state=42
)
# Result: ~15% train, ~45% dev, ~40% test
Step 2: Run Evaluator on Dev Set
Run the judge on every example in the dev set. Compare predictions to human labels.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 213 lines · 69 tokens per session scan A 2dd6b7611aa0
validate-evaluator is a skill published in the GitHub repository marchatton/agent-skills (5 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 69 tokens to every session and 2,260 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 94% identical to validate-evaluator, differing in 19 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
research-engineer
An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.
tika-eval-compare
Compare extracts from two Tika builds over a corpus to detect regressions in content, encoding, exceptions, and embedded-document handling. Use for "compare before/after extracts", "eval this change against the corpus".
neuron-evaluation-engineer
Create and run AI evaluations with datasets, assertions, and output drivers in Neuron AI. Use this skill whenever the user mentions evaluation, testing AI systems, creating evaluators, dataset-driven testing, assertion-based validation, or wants to measure AI system performance. Also trigger for tasks involving…
jetson-validate-image
Use after jetson-flash-image to run static BSP checks, on-target smoke/regression tests on a flashed DUT, or both. Not for build or flash steps. Triggers: validate bsp, on-target validation.
atmos-validation
Validate Atmos projects, components, arbitrary JSON Schema inputs, EditorConfig, and GitHub Actions; use affected-file selection and native CI annotations.
skill-benchmark
Benchmark AI skill effectiveness by measuring implementation quality against legacy constraints.