Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/MarecGents/marec-agent-skillsnpx agentmods add skills/marecgents/marec-agent-skills/check-reasonix-updateWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/marecgents/marec-agent-skills/check-reasonix-update)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/marecgents/marec-agent-skills/check-reasonix-update"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/marecgents/marec-agent-skills/check-reasonix-update/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/marecgents/marec-agent-skills/check-reasonix-update"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/marecgents/marec-agent-skills/check-reasonix-update.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00076 | $0.01314 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00038 | $0.00657 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00263 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00131 |
Grade A, and why
check-reasonix-update scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 137 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Check DeepSeek-Reasonix Update
检查 DeepSeek-Reasonix 最新版的更新日志,翻译总结并对比旧版本变更,将报告保存到 ./ReasonixUpdateLog/。
工作流程
第一步:检查本地已有总结
- 查看
./ReasonixUpdateLog/目录是否存在- 如果不存在,创建它
- 列出该目录下所有
.md文件 - 逐个读取文件内容,从内容中提取已总结的最新版本号
- 搜索模式:「最新版(vX.Y.Z)」或
vX.Y.Z - 取最大的版本号作为「已总结的最新版本」
- 如果没有找到任何文件或版本号,标记为「无已有总结」
- 搜索模式:「最新版(vX.Y.Z)」或
第二步:获取 GitHub 最新版本
- 用
web_fetch获取以下 URL 的内容:https://github.com/esengine/DeepSeek-Reasonix/releases - 从页面中找到最新的 CLI release 版本号(格式
v1.x.x) - 降级路径:若 releases 页面为动态渲染导致 HTML 解析失败或无法获取,改用 GitHub API:
从返回 JSON 的https://api.github.com/repos/esengine/DeepSeek-Reasonix/releases/latesttag_name字段提取最新版本号。API 也失败则报告网络问题并停止。
第三步:版本对比决策
- 比较 GitHub 最新版与已总结的最新版本:
- 如果 GitHub 最新版 ≤ 已总结版本 → 输出「✅ 已是最新版本 vX.X.X,无需更新」,停止任务
- 如果 GitHub 最新版 > 已总结版本 或 无已有总结 → 继续执行
第四步:获取详细更新日志
- 获取最新版 release 详情页:
https://github.com/esengine/DeepSeek-Reasonix/releases/tag/vX.X.X - 同时获取前一个版本的 release 详情页(用于对比基准)
第五步:翻译与对比分析
- 将最新版的更新内容逐条翻译为中文,按功能领域分类:
- Memory 系统变更
- MCP / Plugin 变更
- Desktop / TUI / CLI 变更
- 架构重构
- Bug 修复
- 其他改进
- 制作新版本 vs 旧版本的详细对比表
第六步:保存报告
-
生成完整的 Markdown 总结报告,内容包含:
- 版本概览(版本号、发布时间、对比基准、发布链接)
- 更新内容中文翻译(按分类整理,逐条列出)
- 版本对比表(新 vs 旧,多维度对比)
- 关键发现与趋势分析
- 报告信息(生成时间、保存路径)
-
报告文件命名规则:
DeepSeek-Reasonix-v{版本号}-更新日志总结-{YYYY-MM-DD-HHmm}.md例如:
DeepSeek-Reasonix-v1.13.0-更新日志总结-2026-06-28-1530.md -
保存到
./ReasonixUpdateLog/目录
第七步:输出摘要
- 输出最终结果摘要:
- 检查的版本
- 报告文件路径
- 主要更新亮点(3-5 条)
流程图
开始
│
├─ 检查 ./ReasonixUpdateLog/ 目录
│ │
│ ▼
│ 读取已有报告,提取已总结的最新版本号
│
├─ 获取 GitHub Releases 页面 → 得到最新版号
│
├─ 比较版本
│ ├─ 已是最新 → 输出消息,停止 ✅
│ └─ 有新版本 → 继续 ⏩
│ │
│ ├─ 获取详细发布说明
│ ├─ 翻译 + 按领域分类
│ ├─ 制作对比表
│ │
│ └─ 生成报告 → 保存到 ./ReasonixUpdateLog/
│
└─ 输出结果摘要
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 137 lines · 76 tokens per session scan A dd326f4abf2f
check-reasonix-update is a skill published in the GitHub repository MarecGents/marec-agent-skills (3 stars, last pushed 13d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 76 tokens to every session and 1,314 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
fabric-fusion
Multi-model deliberation. Two to 8 distinct models answer in parallel with web-capable tools, then a judge compares consensus, contradictions, coverage gaps, unique insights, and blind spots. Act mode runs 1–4 read-only references, then one actor reconciles and executes. Use when the cost of being wrong justifies…
fabric-rlm
Recursively decomposes oversized tasks into bounded child Pi agents with fresh context windows. Use for whole-repo audits, massive-context analysis, and multi-file refactors that do not fit one context.
fabric-exec
Python-only troubleshooting and advanced host API reference for fabricexec. Routine pi. coding calls are documented by ambient guidance; load this skill only after an argument-shape error or when an advanced surface needs exact contracts.
fabric-schema
Uses Fabric's typed Schema evidence loop and, when enabled, its bounded local-file transaction channel. Use when surprise must void a plan and mutation claims need explicit postconditions.
fabric-workflow
Runs a dynamic Pi Fabric workflow with code-held phases, fan-out, pipelines, structured agents, and best-effort verification. Use for large audits, migrations, parallel research, or explicit workflow requests.
fabric-council
Runs a bounded multi-perspective Pi Fabric council with independent reviewers and best-effort synthesis. Use for architecture choices, plans, reviews, and adversarial cross-checking.