Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add MarieLynneBlock/arcanum-artifex --skill review-and-refactorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/MarieLynneBlock/arcanum-artifexWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/marielynneblock/arcanum-artifex/review-and-refactor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/marielynneblock/arcanum-artifex/review-and-refactor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/marielynneblock/arcanum-artifex/review-and-refactor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/marielynneblock/arcanum-artifex/review-and-refactor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/marielynneblock/arcanum-artifex/review-and-refactor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.00166 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00083 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00033 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00017 |
Grade A, and why
review-and-refactor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 18 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A 0535fd8040e0
review-and-refactor is a skill published in the GitHub repository MarieLynneBlock/arcanum-artifex (4 stars, last pushed 7d ago), with no licence file. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 166 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
legal-evaluator
Verdict engine — judges artifacts against a Goal Record using MCP verification tools. Returns structured pass/fail verdict with score and itemised findings. Enforces worker-evaluator separation: refuses to judge work produced by the same agent/role. Used by /legal-loop. Do NOT trigger for: producing work (drafting…
codebase-sync
Convention discovery and rule generation from codebase analysis. Scans project structure, builds search indexes, identifies patterns, and generates enforceable rules.
ocr
AI-powered multi-agent code review. Simulates a team of Principal Engineers reviewing code from different perspectives. Use when asked to review code, check a PR, analyze changes, or perform code review.
goga-review-plan
Verify execution plan completeness and correctness.
eng-design-doc-review
Reviews a technical design document with fresh context. Trigger on "review the design doc", "audit 6-design.md", "is this design ready", or "/eng-design-doc-review".
goga-review
Dispatcher for specialized review skills.