Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add MarieLynneBlock/arcanum-artifex --skill sql-code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/MarieLynneBlock/arcanum-artifexWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/marielynneblock/arcanum-artifex/sql-code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/marielynneblock/arcanum-artifex/sql-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/marielynneblock/arcanum-artifex/sql-code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/marielynneblock/arcanum-artifex/sql-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/marielynneblock/arcanum-artifex/sql-code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00065 | $0.02163 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.01081 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00433 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00216 |
Grade A, and why
sql-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 304 lines · 65 tokens per session scan A 5695fd8ceba2
sql-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository MarieLynneBlock/arcanum-artifex (4 stars, last pushed 5d ago), with no licence file. It adds 65 tokens to every session and 2,163 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
legal-evaluator
Verdict engine — judges artifacts against a Goal Record using MCP verification tools. Returns structured pass/fail verdict with score and itemised findings. Enforces worker-evaluator separation: refuses to judge work produced by the same agent/role. Used by /legal-loop. Do NOT trigger for: producing work (drafting…
mysql-checkpointing
Make n8n workflows idempotent, resumable, and safe at scale using MySQL/Postgres checkpoint tables, batch processing patterns, duplicate prevention, and dynamic table creation. Use this skill whenever the user is building an n8n workflow that processes batches of data, handles webhooks, polls APIs, or runs on a…
code-review-mean
Code review for MEAN stack apps. Use when reviewing backend (Express + MongoDB) and frontend (React) code for quality, security, architecture compliance, performance, and best practices.
codebase-sync
Convention discovery and rule generation from codebase analysis. Scans project structure, builds search indexes, identifies patterns, and generates enforceable rules.
code-review-patterns
Multi-dimensional code assessment across security, quality, performance, and maintainability with confidence-gated reporting (>=80%) and Router Contract generation.
subagent-driven-development
Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session. Dispatches fresh subagent per task.