Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add marketingskills/seo --skill exceed-quality-thresholdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/marketingskills/seoWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/marketingskills/seo/exceed-quality-threshold)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/marketingskills/seo/exceed-quality-threshold"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/marketingskills/seo/exceed-quality-threshold/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/marketingskills/seo/exceed-quality-threshold"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/marketingskills/seo/exceed-quality-threshold.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00115 | $0.02393 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00046 | $0.00957 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00023 | $0.00479 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00239 |
Grade A, and why
exceed-quality-threshold scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 239 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Exceed Quality Threshold
Purpose
Determine what a page must do to become eligible and preferable for a connected query network. Compare like with like, identify the demonstrated lower and upper boundaries, and require a material usefulness difference rather than superficial imitation.
Treat "quality threshold" as a comparative SEO model, not a disclosed Google score or ranking factor. Separate observations from hypotheses and recommendations. Read references/evidence-and-guardrails.md before making claims about Google, Koray's framework, or prescriptive tactics.
Required inputs
Collect or infer:
- Primary query or topic
- Target page, draft, brief, or proposed resource
- Publishing site and intended source type
- Target market, language, device, and current date
- Intended audience and conversion/task goal
- Any first-party evidence, expertise, data, or tools available
Ask only for a missing input that would materially change the cohort or verdict. If no page exists, evaluate the proposed format and produce a build specification. If the site is unavailable, continue with a provisional page-level assessment and label source-level findings unknown.
Evidence rules
- Use live web search whenever available. SERPs, freshness, page contents, and reputations change.
- Record query, market, language, device when known, and date. Do not imply a neutral or universal SERP.
- Prefer direct inspection of ranking pages over snippets. Snippets cannot establish completeness, evidence, or page experience.
- Cite the pages used for decisive observations. Distinguish observed facts, reasonable inference, and unknowns.
- Never invent rankings, page contents, traffic, links, authority, authorship, methodology, or first-party evidence.
- If live search or page access is unavailable, use user-supplied exports or URLs and label the result
provisional; do not claim to have measured the current threshold. - Do not equate length, heading count, entity count, schema, images, or n-gram overlap with quality. Count an element only when it helps satisfy the task or establishes evidence.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 239 lines · 115 tokens per session scan A b2facee8f878
exceed-quality-threshold is a skill published in the GitHub repository marketingskills/seo (8 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 115 tokens to every session and 2,393 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
seo
Deterministic LLM-first SEO audits for websites, blog posts, and GitHub repositories. Use this when the user asks to "perform SEO analysis", "run SEO audit", "analyze SEO", "check technical SEO", "review schema", "Core Web Vitals", "E-E-A-T", "hreflang", "GEO", "AEO", or GitHub repository SEO optimization. For…
os-check-work
ALWAYS invoke this skill when the user asks about work done outside this session - "check work", "check the others", "check other sessions" - or to accept one: "the session is done, check it", "can we merge it" - in any language. You are the receiving party: treat the report as a claim, verify each part against…
os-done-or-not
ALWAYS invoke this skill when work wraps up or the user asks how it went - "done or not", "are we done", "what happened", "report", "what's the status of this ticket" - in any language, and when a Stop hook asks for a session report. Produces a ten-line plain- language report: a lead, a checkmark table, and a verdict…
os-step-by-step
ALWAYS invoke this skill when you need the user to act - run a command, paste a secret, click, approve - and whenever they ask how to do something or say they do not know what to do: "step by step", "walk me through it", "what do I do", "what should I do", "I don't understand what to do", "explain what I need to do"…
os-what-could-go-wrong
ALWAYS invoke this skill before anything hard to undo gets agreed to - a contract, a purchase, a migration, a launch, a price change, a reorganisation - and whenever the user asks "what could go wrong", "what are we missing", "poke holes in this", or for a premortem or a red team, in any language. Assumes the decision…
os-whats-next
ALWAYS invoke this skill when the user asks what to do next, what is left, or what is blocked - "what's next", "what now", "what should we work on", "anything I can do" - in any language. This skill picks the next piece of work; when the user asks HOW to do a thing or says they do not understand what to do, that is…