Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add markmhendrickson/neotoma --skill final_reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/markmhendrickson/neotomaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/markmhendrickson/neotoma/final_review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/markmhendrickson/neotoma/final_review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/markmhendrickson/neotoma/final_review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00005 | $0.00703 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00351 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00001 | $0.00141 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00070 |
Grade A, and why
final_review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
91% identical to final-review — 12 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 93 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Final Review
Present final implementation for review and approval for Feature Unit {{input:feature_id}}.
Follow foundation/development/feature_unit_workflow.md Step 4 (Checkpoint 2 — Final Review). Configuration is read from foundation-config.yaml.
Implements Checkpoint 2 of the Feature Unit creation workflow. Presents the completed implementation for human review and approval.
Trigger
- Implementation complete
- Tests passing
- PR created (if required by config)
Tasks
-
Load configuration:
- Read
foundation-config.yamlto get feature unit settings - Determine directory structure, testing requirements, git workflow
- Read
-
Run spec compliance validation (if available):
- Execute spec compliance validation script (if repository has one)
- If compliance check fails: STOP and present compliance report to user
- List all gaps found
- Require user to fix gaps, update spec, or explicitly defer requirements before proceeding
- Re-run compliance check after fixes
- If compliance check passes or not available, continue to next step
-
Gather implementation summary:
- List all files changed
- List tests added (with pass status)
- List documentation updated
- PR link and status (if PR required)
- Compliance report link (if generated)
-
Verify completion:
- All required tests passing (based on config)
- Coverage meets configured targets
- PR created with proper format (if required)
- Spec compliance validation passed (if available)
-
Present summary:
- Files changed (count and key files)
- Tests added/passing
- Coverage achieved vs target
- Documentation updated
- PR link (if applicable)
- Spec compliance status (if available)
-
STOP and prompt user:
- "Implementation complete. PR: [link]" (if applicable)
- "Please review the implementation"
- "Approve for merge? (yes/no)"
- "Any final changes needed? (list or 'none')"
- "Spec compliance validation: ✅ Pass / ❌ Fail (see report: [link])" (if available)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 93 lines · 5 tokens per session scan A 826e03d61fee
final_review is a skill published in the GitHub repository markmhendrickson/neotoma (31 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 5 tokens to every session and 703 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 91% identical to final-review, differing in 12 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
security-observability
A read-only tool for examining security events already saved by agent-sec-cli, a command-line security log. It can connect those events to an agent session, run, or trace.
add-backend
Guide for adding a backend (Rust or Python) to the agent-sec-core security middleware. Use when creating new backends, integrating Rust or Python code into the security middleware, or extending with new backend actions.
skill-ledger
A security record for agent skills, which are reusable instruction packages for coding agents. It shows their status, reviews risk exposure, and can certify them with quick or user-approved deeper scans.
regex-mastery
Use this skill when writing regular expressions, debugging pattern matching,optimizing regex performance, or implementing text validation. Triggers on regex, regular expressions, pattern matching, lookahead, lookbehind, named groups, capture groups, backreferences, and any task requiring text pattern matching.
pr-body
A tool that reviews all commits on the current branch and creates or updates a pull request title and description. A pull request is a proposed code change submitted for review.
prompt-scanner
A scanner for text sent to an AI agent, looking for prompt injection and jailbreak attempts. Prompt injection is text that tries to override an agent's instructions; a jailbreak tries to bypass its safety limits.