Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add markoblogo/abvx-agent-skills --skill browser-verificationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/markoblogo/abvx-agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/markoblogo/abvx-agent-skills/browser-verification)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/markoblogo/abvx-agent-skills/browser-verification"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/markoblogo/abvx-agent-skills/browser-verification.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00064 | $0.00480 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00240 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00096 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00048 |
Grade A, and why
browser-verification scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Browser Verification
Trust the browser, not static guesses. Use real rendering for frontend claims.
Setup
Prefer the repo's existing Playwright setup. If none exists, install browser tooling in a local tool directory or temporary environment rather than adding a production dependency.
Use a local static or dev server when file URLs would not match production behavior.
For security review of live targets, request routing through authorized-security-router first so scope, allowed actions, and non-destructive boundaries are explicit.
Verification Loop
- Start the app or static server.
- Open the target URL in a browser-controlled session.
- Check console errors and failed network requests.
- Verify key selectors render and have nonzero bounding boxes.
- Verify images/assets are complete and natural dimensions are nonzero.
- Check desktop and mobile viewports.
- Check horizontal overflow:
document.documentElement.scrollWidth <= innerWidth + 1. - Exercise the primary interaction path.
- Capture screenshots only when useful for review or debugging.
- Stop local servers before finalizing.
Common Assertions
- page loaded with expected title or heading;
- no failed requests for CSS, JS, images, fonts, or data;
- no severe console errors;
- target controls are visible and enabled;
- form submission or navigation reaches expected state;
- responsive layout has no text overlap or horizontal scroll;
- animated/canvas/3D surfaces have nonblank rendered pixels when relevant.
Guardrails
- Do not commit local Playwright tooling unless the repo already owns browser tests.
- Do not claim visual verification if only static checks ran.
- If browser install fails, report the fallback checks honestly.
- For authenticated or paid flows, avoid real side effects unless explicitly approved.
Final Report
Include URLs, viewports, checks run, commands, failures found, and whether screenshots were captured.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 56 lines · 64 tokens per session scan A 467ce894e326
browser-verification is a skill published in the GitHub repository markoblogo/abvx-agent-skills (16 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 64 tokens to every session and 480 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
memstack-development-webapp-testing
Use when the user says 'write browser tests', 'test this page', 'playwright test', 'e2e test', 'end to end test', 'browser test', 'test the UI', or needs Playwright-based browser testing for a web application. Do NOT use for unit tests, API tests, or non-browser testing.
e2e
Generate and run Playwright E2E tests traced to spec.md acceptance criteria, with an optional accessibility audit. Use when saying "e2e tests" or "a11y audit".
qa-knowledge
To run QA engineering — requirements/gap analysis, scenario & spec design, test implementation, failure triage — over the QA knowledge base.
chrome-automation
A browser-automation toolkit for controlling Chrome to visit pages, interact with forms, collect data, run tests, and create screenshots or PDFs.
browser-check
Drive a real browser and come back with a MEASUREMENT rather than an impression - console errors and >=400 responses as counts, computed styles as JSON when appearance is disputed. Use when work touches UI, when a review must verify one, or when fidelity-gate asks for its measurement.
playwright-automation
Browser automation and testing with Playwright. Use when testing web applications, automating browser tasks, taking screenshots, or validating UI behavior.