Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/markoblogo/abvx-agent-skills/graph-guided-code-readingnpx skills add markoblogo/abvx-agent-skills --skill graph-guided-code-readinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/markoblogo/abvx-agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/markoblogo/abvx-agent-skills/graph-guided-code-reading)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/markoblogo/abvx-agent-skills/graph-guided-code-reading"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/markoblogo/abvx-agent-skills/graph-guided-code-reading.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00062 | $0.00628 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00031 | $0.00314 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00126 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00063 |
Grade A, and why
graph-guided-code-reading scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 87 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Graph Guided Code Reading
Save tokens by reading the codebase as a dependency graph, not as a pile of files.
Core Principle
Most repo-reading waste comes from opening too many files too early. Build a small relevance graph first, then read only the nodes that matter.
Minimal Relevance Graph
For each task, identify only:
- the user-visible entrypoint or changed surface;
- the owning module or service;
- the direct dependencies and dependents that shape behavior;
- the nearest tests, config, or contracts that constrain the change.
Stop expanding once the next action is clear.
Reading Workflow
- Start from the highest-signal anchor:
- changed files;
- failing test;
- route, command, job, or entry function;
- exact symbol or error text.
- Build a compact focus set:
- entrypoint;
- implementation module;
- adjacent callers/callees or imports;
- validating tests.
- Read narrow slices around the relevant symbols first.
- Expand one edge at a time only if the current node does not answer the question.
- Maintain a short checked-location ledger so files are not reopened without a reason.
Preferred Tools
- If a repo graph, repomap, AST, or change-impact tool exists, use it first.
- If not, emulate graph reading with:
rgfor symbol ownership;git diff --name-onlyor failing-test paths for anchors;- imports, call sites, and config references for edges;
- nearby tests for behavior contracts.
Task Patterns
PR Review
- Start with changed files and public interfaces.
- Trace immediate blast radius: callers, consumers, schemas, tests.
- Review the impact set before reading unrelated modules.
Debugging
- Start from the failing surface and walk inward.
- Prefer one causal path over opening every suspected file.
- Keep hypotheses tied to specific nodes in the focus set.
Architecture Questions
- Start from entrypoints and major seams, not internal helpers.
- Build a compact service/module map before diving into implementation details.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 87 lines · 62 tokens per session scan A 48264788680c
graph-guided-code-reading is a skill published in the GitHub repository markoblogo/abvx-agent-skills (15 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 62 tokens to every session and 628 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
weave
Parallel strand orchestration — decompose a task into 3+ independently scoped strands, fan out real subagents (worktree-isolated when they write files), and coordinate through a session file and Insight Capsules. Use ONLY when the user explicitly invokes it by name or slash command.
coding-agents-farm
To orchestrate parallel coding-agent farms (Claude, Codex, Copilot, Gemini, etc.) on isolated git worktrees.
mcp-media-inbox-triage
Find media, partnership, and high-intent requests buried in a shared Gmail inbox, summarize the useful ones, and route them to the right owner through Zapier MCP.
customer-deck-builder
Build tailored customer-facing sales or customer success decks from approved account context and generate the presentation with Gamma through Zapier MCP.
premortem
First-principles premortem on a high-stakes plan: assume failure 6–18 months out, reconstruct causal death chains, surface hidden assumptions, deliver a revised reversibility-weighted plan. Use ONLY when the user explicitly invokes it by name or slash command.
bcc-plan-spar
BCC align+lock+review PLAN.md for one slice (no product code). Slash: /bcc-plan-spar · chat: bcc:plan-spar · "lock PLAN" · spar the plan. Args: rounds=N (auto-review cap), review=self|subagent|cli|auto|off. Grill until clear enough (no default Q&A quota). Hand off to bcc-clean-cut after human APPROVE.