Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add martin1847/evolab --skill source-coding-disciplinegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/martin1847/evolabWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/martin1847/evolab/source-coding-discipline)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/martin1847/evolab/source-coding-discipline"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/martin1847/evolab/source-coding-discipline/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/martin1847/evolab/source-coding-discipline"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/martin1847/evolab/source-coding-discipline.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00105 | $0.00696 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00042 | $0.00278 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00139 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00070 |
Grade A, and why
source-coding-discipline scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
写码纪律（碰源码文件时加载）
镜像注：四段纪律正文与本仓库
templates/rules/coding.md同源（路径相对 evolab 仓库根；本 skill 单独 cp 安装后该文件不随行，同步义务只落在仓库维护侧）—— rules 形态给支持paths:条件加载的 agent（Claude Code / omp），skill 形态给不支持的（codex 等）。 改任一边必须同步另一边（硬门：test/mirror-sync.test.sh四段逐字 diff，漂移即红）； 同一 agent 勿两种形态同装（双重注入）。
先思考再编码：显式说出假设，不确定就问；多种解读全部列出、不静默选边；有更简单的路径就说出来；困惑就停下来问。
简单优先——交付物代码零投机（仅限交付物；风险枚举 / 预判 / 评审轴不受此限、该大胆发散）：不做超出要求的功能；单次使用的代码不抽象；没要求的"灵活性/可配置性"不引入；不可能发生的场景不写错误处理。写了 200 行能压到 50 行的，重写。自问："资深工程师会觉得这过度复杂吗？"
外科手术式改动：每一行改动都能直接追溯到用户请求。不"改进"邻近代码/注释/格式，顺应已有风格。自己的改动产生的孤儿（未用 import/变量/函数）要清；既有死代码指出来、不删。
目标驱动执行：把任务转成可验证目标——"加校验"→"为非法输入写测试并让它过"；"修 bug"→"先写能复现的测试再修到过"；"重构"→"改前改后测试都过"。多步任务先列简短计划：步骤 → 验证。强验证标准让你独立循环，弱标准（"能跑"）需要不停澄清。
验证诚实性：禁止声称测试通过、命令成功、文件存在，除非实际跑过 / 读过。未跑就说"未运行验证"。完成时简短说明：改了什么 / 跑了什么验证 / 什么没验证 / 剩余假设或风险。
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 24 lines · 105 tokens per session scan A f9cf23b71358
source-coding-discipline is a skill published in the GitHub repository martin1847/evolab (7 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 105 tokens to every session and 696 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
Pair Programming
AI-assisted pair programming with multiple modes (driver/navigator/switch), real-time verification, quality monitoring, and comprehensive testing. Supports TDD, debugging, refactoring, and learning sessions. Features automatic role switching, continuous code review, security scanning, and performance optimization with…
loop-verifier
Independent verification agent for loop-produced changes. Finds reasons to reject. Runs tests. Confirms diff scope. Use after minimal-fix or any implementer sub-agent — never in the same role as the implementer.
skill-coverage-audit
Trace codepaths in diffs, map against tests, auto-generate missing coverage — use before shipping PRs.
babysit
Watch an open PR — fix failing CI, handle the straightforward review comments, and drive it to a mergeable state. Claude Code analog of Cursor's built-in /babysit. Use after opening a PR when the user wants the agent to shepherd it without re-prompting.
make-pr-easy-to-review
Prepare PRs for review by cleaning noisy history, improving PR descriptions, and adding reviewer guidance without changing code behavior. Use for "make this easy to review", "tidy this PR", "clean up commits", or "annotate the diff".
thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review
Run an extremely strict maintainability review for abstraction quality, giant files, and spaghetti-condition growth. Use for a thermo-nuclear code quality review, thermonuclear review, deep code quality audit, or especially harsh maintainability review.