Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add martinholovsky/SOTA-skills --skill sotagit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/martinholovsky/SOTA-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/martinholovsky/sota-skills/sota)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/martinholovsky/sota-skills/sota"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/martinholovsky/sota-skills/sota/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/martinholovsky/sota-skills/sota"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/martinholovsky/sota-skills/sota.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00214 | $0.09130 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00107 | $0.04565 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00043 | $0.01826 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00913 |
Grade A, and why
sota scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed CC-BY-4.0
The repository is licensed CC-BY-4.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday Changed · +4 lines 1dbd74e84ee0
- 2d ago Changed · +7 lines 9fed68c632e5
- 3d ago Changed · +1 lines e6924f0c51be
- 7d ago Changed · -101 lines e4d1b8a789ee
- 7d ago Changed e09a7cee303b
- 11d ago First seen · 500 lines · 214 tokens per session scan A 113140eebd77
sota is a skill published in the GitHub repository martinholovsky/SOTA-skills (19 stars, last pushed today), licensed CC-BY-4.0. It adds 214 tokens to every session and 9,130 once invoked, about $0.0011 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
claude-md-review
Audit a CLAUDE.md file for the patterns that actually degrade Claude Code's output — vagueness, unnamed files, stale facts, and bloat. Use when asked to review, audit, improve, shrink, or fix a CLAUDE.md, and when a project's results feel inconsistent or Claude keeps rediscovering the same context.
eval-agents
Audit Claude Code agents defined in .claude/agents/ for description specificity, model tier appropriateness, tools scoping, and system prompt quality. Detects dispatch ambiguity between agents, flags over-permissive tool grants, and checks for human-in-the-loop patterns that break programmatic orchestration. Use when…
land-and-deploy
Merge PR, wait for CI, verify deploy, run canary. The complete landing pipeline.
git-ai-archaeology
Analyze AI config evolution in a git repo. Use when mapping AI adoption history, finding when configs were first introduced, charting commit velocity by month, or identifying maturity phases in a project's AI tooling.
investigate
Systematic root-cause debugging: find the cause before writing any fix.
source-command-methodology-advisor
Analyzes your codebase and asks 3 targeted questions to recommend the right AI-assisted development methodology stack.