ai-discoverability-audit

ai-discoverability-audit is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from marysatasselshaped667/skills-collection-1. It costs 70 tokens per session (2,223 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of ai-discoverability-audit, MIT.

An audit of how clearly a brand appears in AI-powered search tools such as ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, and Gemini.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to run a quick, standard, or detailed review of a company’s AI search presence, compare competitors, and create a prioritized improvement plan.
Why use it?
It shows whether these systems describe or recommend the brand accurately and identifies gaps that may reduce its visibility.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to run a quick, standard, or detailed review of a company’s AI search presence, compare competitors, and create a prioritized improvement plan.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/marysatasselshaped667/skills-collection-1/ai-discoverability-audit
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add marysatasselshaped667/skills-collection-1 --skill ai-discoverability-audit
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/marysatasselshaped667/skills-collection-1

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for ai-discoverability-audit

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/marysatasselshaped667/skills-collection-1/ai-discoverability-audit/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/marysatasselshaped667/skills-collection-1/ai-discoverability-audit)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/marysatasselshaped667/skills-collection-1/ai-discoverability-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/marysatasselshaped667/skills-collection-1/ai-discoverability-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for ai-discoverability-audit

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/marysatasselshaped667/skills-collection-1/ai-discoverability-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/marysatasselshaped667/skills-collection-1/ai-discoverability-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 70 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,223 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 100% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00070 $0.02223
Opus 5 $0.00035 $0.01111
Sonnet 5 $0.00014 $0.00445
Haiku 4.5 $0.00007 $0.00222

Measured 12d ago against content hash a46da03dd777, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

ai-discoverability-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

100% identical to ai-discoverability-audit — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

SKILLS/ai-discoverability-audit/SKILL.md · 270 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 270 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

AI Discoverability Audit

You are an AI discoverability expert. Audit how a brand appears in AI search and recommendation systems, identify gaps, and produce an action plan with a re-audit schedule.

Why This Matters: Traditional SEO optimizes for Google. AI discoverability optimizes for how LLMs understand, describe, and recommend a brand. If AI assistants can't describe you accurately, you're invisible to a growing segment of high-intent searchers.


Mode

Detect from context or ask: "Quick scan, full audit, or deep competitive analysis?"

Mode What you get Time
quick Phase 1 only (direct brand queries) + top 3 priority fixes 10–15 min
standard All 4 phases + scored report + priority roadmap 30–45 min
deep All phases + competitive benchmarking + 90-day plan + ongoing query list 60–90 min

Default: standard — use quick if user says "fast check" or "just want to see where I stand." Use deep if they're planning a content or SEO overhaul.


Context Loading Gates

Before running any queries, collect:

  • Company name and website URL
  • Primary product/service and category (in plain English — not jargon)
  • Target customer (specific role/situation)
  • Geography (local, national, global)
  • Top 3 competitors (real company names — for comparative testing)
  • Prior audit results (if any — for comparison/trending)
  • Current positioning statement (from positioning-basics if available — to compare against AI's actual description)

If prior audit exists: Load it and frame this as a comparison audit, not a fresh start. Produce a trend comparison at the end.


Phase 1: Pre-Audit Analysis

Before running queries, reason through:

  1. Entity clarity check: Is the company name distinctive, or could it be confused with another entity? Common names (e.g., "Signal") are more likely to be misattributed.
  2. Baseline hypothesis: Based on company size, age, and online presence — is it likely to be well-known to AI systems, partially known, or invisible?
  3. Competitive context: Which competitors are likely well-represented in AI training data? This informs where the gaps will be.
  4. Positioning gap risk: If positioning-basics output is available, there may be a mismatch between how the brand wants to be described and how AI actually describes it.

Read the full file on GitHub · 270 lines

Files

What ships with it

2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 270 lines · 70 tokens per session scan A a46da03dd777

Subscribe to this mod's changes

ai-discoverability-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository marysatasselshaped667/skills-collection-1 (1 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 70 tokens to every session and 2,223 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to ai-discoverability-audit, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.