What the reviewer found

Digital-forensics playbook for investigating a compromised Linux host from a read-only-mounted forensic image (/mnt/evidence) into a local case folder — copying /etc/shadow and .ssh keys from the evidence image is standard incident-response practice, not exfiltration, and nothing leaves the machine. `rm -rf /` and `chmod 777` only appear inside a Python list of strings the tool searches for in a suspect's bash history, and .wget-hsts is a file being copied, not a network call.

• dual-use — a security tool that can be misused
• credential-access — reads credentials

What was read

The file as it ships in marysatasselshaped667/skills-collection-1:

• SKILLS/analyzing-linux-system-artifacts/SKILL.md

What the static scan said

The scan flagged 4things. The reviewer kept 0 and dismissed 4 as false.

• PE2Asks for root — false positive
• PE3Reaches for credential files — false positive
• RMRecursive force delete — false positive
• NETMakes network calls — false positive

How this review was made

Sonnet 5 read the files above on 7 September 2026 and answered three questions: is it dangerous to whoever installs it, is each scanner finding real, and what should the installer know. The verdict is bound to the file's hash; when the file changes, it is scanned afresh and reviewed again. A script that changes while the definition does not is not re-reviewed — that is a known gap. How the scan and the review work.

Produced by agentmods.dev · Sonnet 5 · 7 September 2026