review-case

review-case is a skill for Claude Code from masamnisakasama/underwriting-mcp. It costs 47 tokens per session (366 once invoked), scanned A, original, no licence file.

A document-review workflow for insurance applications, health declarations, and medical examination results. It sends several pages to an AWS-based MCP service and produces possible underwriting decisions with supporting evidence; underwriting is the process of assessing insurance risk.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review insurance applications and medical records, extract relevant evidence, and prepare candidate underwriting decisions.
Why use it?
It helps organise information spread across multiple health and insurance documents. Evidence-backed suggestions make the proposed insurance assessment easier to review.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the underwriting-review plugin — 2 skills shipped together

Good fit Use it to review insurance applications and medical records, extract relevant evidence, and prepare candidate underwriting decisions.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/masamnisakasama/underwriting-mcp/review-case
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add masamnisakasama/underwriting-mcp --skill review-case
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/masamnisakasama/underwriting-mcp

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install underwriting-review, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 2 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for review-case

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/masamnisakasama/underwriting-mcp/review-case/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/masamnisakasama/underwriting-mcp/review-case)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/masamnisakasama/underwriting-mcp/review-case"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/masamnisakasama/underwriting-mcp/review-case/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for review-case

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/masamnisakasama/underwriting-mcp/review-case"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/masamnisakasama/underwriting-mcp/review-case.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 47 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 366 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00047 $0.00366
Opus 5 $0.00023 $0.00183
Sonnet 5 $0.00009 $0.00073
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00037

Measured 12d ago against content hash a386dbdbaaf4, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review-case scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

The scan reads SKILL.md. This mod also ships 1 executable file (scripts/upload_case.py), listed below but not scanned — reading those needs a real analyzer, not pattern matching.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugin/underwriting-review/skills/review-case/SKILL.md · 33 lines

The source is not reproduced here

No licence file

A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.

Read it on GitHub

Files

What ships with it

3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 33 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A a386dbdbaaf4

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review-case is a skill published in the GitHub repository masamnisakasama/underwriting-mcp (0 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 366 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

html-ppt-zhangzara-stencil-tablet

A workplace-safety compliance review for a manufacturing regulator — findings, the evidence chain, and the corrective mandate. Built as a decision-grade policy briefing deck for regulator, plant leadership.

nexu-io/open-design · 49 tokens

treatment-plans

Format and structurally validate local treatment-plan documentation after clinical decisions have already been supplied and verified by authorized licensed professionals. Use for source traceability, clinician-authored intervention records, goals and checkpoints, shared-decision records, reconciliation handoffs, and…

K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills · 62 tokens

handbook-updates

Diff a proposed handbook change against the current version, flag ripple effects and state supplement impacts. Use when user says "update the handbook", "add this to the handbook", "handbook change", or has a policy ready for insertion.

anthropics/claude-for-legal · 52 tokens

software-copyright-materials

A workflow for creating Chinese application materials for software copyright registration from a real software project.

Fokkyp/SoftwareCopyright-Skill · 97 tokens

iflytek-contract-intelligence-review

A contract-review workflow for scanned or digital agreements. It can recognize document text, examine clauses, detect risks, check compliance, and create translation summaries; its output is for review and is not formal legal advice.

iflytek/iFly-Skills · 116 tokens

legal-writer

Legal document drafting -- contracts, memos, briefs, complaints, demand letters, opinions, discovery, settlements, ToS, privacy policies. Full pipeline: document structure, per-section writing, Bluebook citation, case law lookup (CourtListener API), regulation lookup (eCFR API), DOCX output, and TDD-style verification…

kortix-ai/suna · 161 tokens