Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add mastra-ai/mastra --skill gh-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mastra-ai/mastraWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mastra-ai/mastra/gh-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mastra-ai/mastra/gh-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mastra-ai/mastra/gh-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mastra-ai/mastra/gh-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mastra-ai/mastra/gh-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00084 | $0.02153 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00034 | $0.00861 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00431 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00215 |
Grade C, and why
gh-review scanned grade C with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 23d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Harvests environment variableshighData exfiltration
Enumerating or grepping the environment for keys collects credentials unrelated to what the mod says it does.
Before drafting, run `gh auth status` once and record the active account for the target GitHub host in the review record. Do not dump environment variables or expose tokens. The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 23d ago First seen · 109 lines · 84 tokens per session scan C e26d5035b068
gh-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository mastra-ai/mastra (28,835 stars, last pushed today), with no licence file. It adds 84 tokens to every session and 2,153 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it C with 1 finding (harvests environment variables). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-23.
Other skills, from other repositories
otto-pr-review-loop
Run Polly and OCR on a PR until all findings settle.
resolve-drive-pr
Drive an open PR through current CI, independent Polly and OCR reviews, preview, and maintainer handoff.
otto-review-remediation
Handle trusted reviewers' change requests on Otto PRs.
lean-review
CocoLean diff-scoped over-engineering audit — scans uncommitted git diff and applies five classification tags (delete/stdlib/native/yagni/shrink) to identify unnecessary surface area before commit.
github-commenting
How to post clean, rich, deduplicated GitHub PR review comments — suggestion blocks, multi-line anchors, markers, formatting rules. Load before posting or fixing any PR comment.
gh-address-comments
This skill should be used when addressing GitHub pull request review comments systematically with mandatory resolution tracking. Use when user says "address PR comments", "fix review feedback", "handle PR review", "resolve PR threads", or needs to ensure all review comments are addressed before merging. Fetches…