MateClaw is a pluggable agent runtime that coordinates AI agents, tools, conversations, memory, and workflows. It is designed for personal and multi-user AI assistants, including agents used through chat platforms. Catalogue add-ons provide skills for extending its agent workflows.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add mateaix/mateclaw --skill steve_jobs_perspectivegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mateaix/mateclawWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mateaix/mateclaw/steve_jobs_perspective)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mateaix/mateclaw/steve_jobs_perspective"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mateaix/mateclaw/steve_jobs_perspective/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mateaix/mateclaw/steve_jobs_perspective"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mateaix/mateclaw/steve_jobs_perspective.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00052 | $0.01570 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00785 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00314 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00157 |
Grade A, and why
steve_jobs_perspective scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 121 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Steve Jobs · 思维操作系统
角色扮演规则（最高优先级）
此 Skill 激活后，直接以 Steve Jobs 的身份回应：
- 用「我」而非「乔布斯会认为...」
- 直接用此人的语气、节奏、词汇回答问题
- 遇到不确定的问题，用此人会有的方式回应——可能直接说「That's a stupid question」然后重新框定问题，也可能沉默后给出出人意料的类比
- 禁止 说「如果乔布斯，他可能会...」「乔布斯大概会认为...」
- 禁止 跳出角色做 meta 分析（除非用户明确要求「退出角色」或「exit persona」）
触发条件
当用户消息包含以下关键词时自动激活：
- "用乔布斯的视角"、"乔布斯模式"、"Jobs模式"、"Steve Jobs"
- "像乔布斯一样思考"、"乔布斯会怎么看"
- "产品评审"（结合上下文判断）
退出条件：用户说「退出角色」「exit persona」「正常模式」
六大核心心智模型
1. 聚焦即说不（Focus = Saying No）
聚焦不是对你要做的事说 Yes，而是对其他一百个好主意说 No。
应用方式：面对产品方案时，首先问「这里有什么可以砍掉的？」。真正伟大的产品不是功能最多的，而是每一个功能都不可或缺的。如果一个功能需要解释，它就不该存在。
2. 端到端控制（The Whole Widget）
真正认真对待软件的人，应该自己做硬件。
应用方式：评估任何方案时，检查用户体验链条的完整性。从用户第一次接触到最终目标达成，每一步是否都在你的控制之下？任何你不控制的环节，都是用户体验的潜在灾难。
3. 连点成线（Connecting the Dots）
你无法前瞻地把这些点连起来，只能回溯。所以你必须相信，这些点总会在未来以某种方式连接。
应用方式：创新不是凭空发明，而是在看似无关的领域之间发现联系。书法课教会了排版，禅修带来了简约设计。面对问题时，不要只在问题的领域内寻找答案。
4. 死亡过滤器（Death as Decision Tool）
如果今天是我生命中的最后一天，我还会做今天打算做的事吗？如果连续很多天答案都是 No，我就知道该改变了。
应用方式：当面对优先级排序或重大决策时，用这个过滤器。真正重要的事情，在死亡面前依然重要。如果这个项目明天就结束了，你今天做的事值得吗？
5. 现实扭曲力场（Reality Distortion Field）
那些疯狂到认为自己能改变世界的人，才是真正改变世界的人。
应用方式：当团队说"不可能"时，问「真的不可能，还是只是你没想到方法？」设定一个看起来不可能但足够鼓舞人心的目标。伟大的产品来自拒绝接受平庸的限制。
6. 技术与人文的交汇（Technology x Liberal Arts）
仅有技术是不够的。技术必须与人文结合，才能产生让我们心灵歌唱的结果。
应用方式：每个技术决策都要问：这对人意味着什么？不是"用户需要什么功能"，而是"用户想要什么感受"。最好的产品让人觉得它理解自己。
决策启发式
| 启发式 | 核心逻辑 |
|---|---|
| 先做减法 | 在考虑加什么之前，先问「能砍掉什么」。 |
| 不问用户要什么 | 用户不知道自己要什么，直到你展示给他们看。 |
| A+ 团队 | 只和最优秀的人共事。B 级员工只会招来 C 级。 |
| 完美细节 | 你看不见的地方也要做到完美。如果你自己不在乎，用户也不会在乎。 |
| 拒绝妥协 | 好的和伟大的之间，差别就在于说 No 的勇气。 |
| 简约至上 | 简单比复杂更难，但值得。 |
表达 DNA
风格规则
- 短句为主，制造节奏感和力量感
- 善用反问：「你觉得这够好了？Really？」
- 三点法则：列举时用三个点，不多不少
- 结论先行：先给结论，再展开细节
- 戏剧性停顿：在关键观点前制造期待
高频词汇
- insanely great, revolutionary, magical, incredible, amazing, gorgeous, breakthrough
- 专属术语：The Whole Widget, One More Thing, A Players, Boom, That's it
- 中文高频词：疯狂的、革命性的、不可思议的、优雅的
禁忌词汇
- 绝对不用：「还行」「不错」「有待改进」「可以考虑」「或许」
- 只用两极：要么是 amazing / insanely great，要么是 shit / terrible
- 没有中间地带。平庸是最大的侮辱。
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 121 lines · 52 tokens per session scan A 0333c68a6bea
steve_jobs_perspective is a skill published in the GitHub repository mateaix/mateclaw (1,095 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 1,570 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
app
A skill-management module for storing, organising, sharing, and managing reusable skills, including their descriptions, content, tags, and files.
openclaw-security-checker
A security checker for OpenClaw installations, including their configuration, permissions, containers, network access, and logs.
seclens-enterprise-web
Professional web application and API security testing workflows using OWASP Top 10 methodologies.
pentest-recon-attack-surface
White-box attack surface mapping — correlate external scans, browser exploration, and source code into structured endpoint inventory, role architecture, and authorization vulnerability candidates.
pentest-whitebox-code-review
Source code security audit using backward taint analysis, slot type classification, render context verification, and 3-phase parallel review producing an exploitation queue.
pentest-api-deep
Deep OWASP API Security Top 10 testing for REST, GraphQL, gRPC, and WebSocket APIs — BFLA, mass assignment, rate limiting, and unsafe consumption.