Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add matebenyovszky/agentplaybooks --skill review-notesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/matebenyovszky/agentplaybooksWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/matebenyovszky/agentplaybooks/review-notes)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/matebenyovszky/agentplaybooks/review-notes"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/matebenyovszky/agentplaybooks/review-notes/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/matebenyovszky/agentplaybooks/review-notes"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/matebenyovszky/agentplaybooks/review-notes.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00029 | $0.00123 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00049 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00025 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00012 |
Grade A, and why
review-notes scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 21d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Review notes
Read the diff and the references/checklist.md file in this skill, then write
review notes the author can act on.
- Lead with blocking issues, then suggestions, then nits.
- Cite files and symbols, not line numbers that will drift.
- Ask for tests when behavior changed and none were added.
- Do not request unrelated refactors.
Keep the tone specific and kind.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 21d ago First seen · 18 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A c3d0c550a926
review-notes is a skill published in the GitHub repository matebenyovszky/agentplaybooks (9 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 123 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-27.
Other skills, from other repositories
wcode
Use the wcode plugin and its MCP tools for repository coding, review, debugging, refactoring, architecture, Graph/Design inspection, safe edits, command execution, and verification. Trigger whenever wcode is installed or named, even when its tools are lazily registered or omitted from the host's initial tool list.
open-code-review
Performs AI-powered code review on Git changes using the ocr CLI from alibaba/open-code-review. Use when the user asks to review code, review a pull request, review staged/unstaged changes, review a commit, or compare branches for code quality issues. Produces line-level review comments and can automatically apply…
learn-from-sage
Detection-gap (miss) analysis for Code Review Sage. Learn from shipped fixes, acted-on human comments, and design outcomes to close reviewer blind spots. Inline during review stages a candidate; a human triggers a one-shot AI consolidation into the live ruleset.
meta-codereview-current-diff
Read the current uncommitted diff, run three independent reviewers (safety + tests-coverage + style) in parallel, then arbitrate a single BLOCK / BLOCKWITHOVERRIDE / PASSWITHNOTES verdict. Use before commit when you want a multi-perspective second-opinion instead of a single-reviewer agent loop.
omh-image-cards
This is an OMH img-summary workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
omh-verification-gate
This is an OMH verification-gate workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).