intake-sufficiency-pl

intake-sufficiency-pl is a skill for Claude Code from matematicsolutions/awesome-matematic-skills-pl. It costs 250 tokens per session (3,220 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

Sprawdzian, czy zlecenie pracy prawnej zawiera wystarczająco dużo informacji, zanim rozpocznie się analiza. Bada cel, zakres, strony, fakty, dokumenty i ograniczenia oraz wskazuje braki.

In plain words
What is it for?
Służy do oceny briefów i zleceń prawnych, wskazywania brakującego kontekstu oraz przygotowania pytań do klienta przed rozpoczęciem pracy.
Why use it?
Pomaga uniknąć zgadywania, gdy klient przekazuje zbyt ogólną prośbę, na przykład „sprawdźcie tę umowę”. Zamienia niejasności w konkretne pytania uzupełniające.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter.

Part of the fundament-weryfikacyjny plugin — 11 skills shipped together

Good fit Służy do oceny briefów i zleceń prawnych, wskazywania brakującego kontekstu oraz przygotowania pytań do klienta przed rozpoczęciem pracy.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/matematicsolutions/awesome-matematic-skills-pl/intake-sufficiency-pl
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add matematicsolutions/awesome-matematic-skills-pl --skill intake-sufficiency-pl
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/matematicsolutions/awesome-matematic-skills-pl

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install fundament-weryfikacyjny, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 11 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for intake-sufficiency-pl

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/matematicsolutions/awesome-matematic-skills-pl/intake-sufficiency-pl/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/matematicsolutions/awesome-matematic-skills-pl/intake-sufficiency-pl)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/matematicsolutions/awesome-matematic-skills-pl/intake-sufficiency-pl"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/matematicsolutions/awesome-matematic-skills-pl/intake-sufficiency-pl/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for intake-sufficiency-pl

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/matematicsolutions/awesome-matematic-skills-pl/intake-sufficiency-pl"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/matematicsolutions/awesome-matematic-skills-pl/intake-sufficiency-pl.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 250 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 3,220 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00250 $0.03220
Opus 5.5 $0.00100 $0.01288
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00050 $0.00644
Haiku 4.5 $0.00025 $0.00322

Measured 17d ago against content hash ad606980f312, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

intake-sufficiency-pl scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 17d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

fundament-weryfikacyjny/skills/intake-sufficiency-pl/SKILL.md · 195 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 195 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Intake Sufficiency PL - ocena wystarczalnosci zlecenia

Filozofia

Polowa zlych opinii prawnych to nie blad analizy, tylko zbyt cienkie wejscie. Klient pisze "sprawdzcie te umowe", po czym okazuje sie, ze nie wiadomo wobec jakiego ryzyka, kto jest druga strona ani jaki jest cel. Ten skill nazywa to, czego brakuje, ZANIM zacznie sie praca - i zamienia luki w konkretne pytania do klienta, zamiast w domysly wpisane do deliverable.

Skill nie wykonuje pracy prawnej. Ocenia kompletnosc wejscia i generuje pytania.

Lustro routera

  • legal-request-router-pl patrzy na zadanie i decyduje, jaka kontrole dac outputowi (grounding / debata / paczka).
  • intake-sufficiency-pl patrzy na zlecenie i decyduje, czy wejscie wystarcza, by zaczac.

Naturalna kolejnosc: najpierw intake-sufficiency (czy mam dosc), potem praca, potem router (jak skontrolowac wynik).

Rubryka wystarczalnosci (6 wymiarow, 0-100)

Wymiar Pytanie kontrolne Waga
Cel Czy wiadomo, po co klient przychodzi (opinia / audyt / pismo / negocjacja)? 20
Zakres Czy zakres jest zdefiniowany (co wchodzi, co nie)? 20
Podmiot Czy strony / podmiot sa zidentyfikowane (nazwa, NIP/KRS, rola)? 15
Fakty Czy sa dokumenty albo stan faktyczny do oparcia analizy? 20
Ograniczenia Czy znane sa twarde ograniczenia (deadline, budzet, poufnosc, jurysdykcja)? 15
Kryteria sukcesu Czy wiadomo, co dla klienta znaczy dobry wynik? 10

Werdykt: strong >= 80, adequate >= 50, insufficient < 50.

Workflow

  1. Pseudonimizuj wejscie przez let-it-be, jesli zawiera dane objete tajemnica.
  2. Oceń zlecenie wg 6 wymiarow rubryki - kazdy wymiar ma fakty na poparcie oceny, nie ogolnik.
  3. Wypisz luki i niejednoznacznosci - co konkretnie jest nieobecne lub niejasne.
  4. Wyodrebnij premisy prawne klienta - kazde twierdzenie PRAWNE w zleceniu ("termin juz minal", "umowa jest niewazna, bo brak formy", "przepis X tego zakazuje", "mamy 14 dni na odpowiedz") to premisa do weryfikacji, nie fakt. Klient moze sie mylic co do prawa, a analiza zbudowana na blednej premisie jest bledna w calosci, nawet gdy rozumowanie jest poprawne. Kazda premise:
    • wypisz osobno z tagiem [premisa klienta - do weryfikacji u zrodla],
    • jesli jest ISTOTNA dla wyniku: zweryfikuj przed startem (SAOS / ISAP / saos-orzecznictwo / tekst umowy) albo dodaj do pytan/instrukcji wstepnych jako pierwsze zadanie,
    • jesli weryfikacja ja OBALA: powiedz to wprost i nie kontynuuj na blednym zalozeniu - nawet jesli klient przedstawil je stanowczo.
  5. Wygeneruj pytania uzupelniajace - jedno pytanie na luke, kazde przypisane do wymiaru, oznaczone wymagane/opcjonalne. Pytanie ma byc gotowe do wyslania klientowi, nie notatka dla siebie.
  6. Zloz szkielet karty zlecenia - cel / zakres / podmiot / ryzyka / kryteria sukcesu / instrukcje wstepne. Pola, ktorych nie da sie wypelnic z wejscia, zostaja jawnie "(do ustalenia - patrz pytania)".

Read the full file on GitHub · 195 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 17d ago Changed ad606980f312
  2. 21d ago Changed · +32 lines bbb94585d97e
  3. 1mo ago First seen · 163 lines · 250 tokens per session scan A f0af64df6028

Subscribe to this mod's changes

intake-sufficiency-pl is a skill published in the GitHub repository matematicsolutions/awesome-matematic-skills-pl (8 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 250 tokens to every session and 3,220 once invoked, about $0.0010 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

mqc-timeline-master

Turn raw case materials into a faithful, court-ready case timeline (SVG + PNG + PPTX + VSDX + drawio, plus a traceability index in Word). Use this whenever the user hands over litigation materials — a judgment, complaint, defence, evidence list, contract, bank or Alipay statement, WeChat screenshots, scanned exhibits…

zeweihan/aiworkdeck · 269 tokens

mqc-litigation-visual-redraw

Redraw a litigation diagram into a restrained, court-ready presentation graphic (SVG + PNG) WITHOUT changing any text or legal meaning. Use this whenever the user supplies a case timeline, a legal process flowchart, OR a party/relationship diagram and wants it cleaned up, beautified, redrawn, made professional…

zeweihan/aiworkdeck · 257 tokens

universal-standards

LegalAnt operating protocol — HITL gates, citation completeness, hallucination defence, Indian law default, data security, and mandatory disclaimer. Applies to every agent on every matter.

ishwarjha/legalant · 41 tokens

niw-package-review

Reviews an assembled EB-2 NIW petition package before filing, as a skeptical adjudicator would. Reads the actual exhibits, recommendation letters and petition draft, tests each Dhanasar prong against the preponderance standard on documented evidence only, quotes the specific petition passages that overclaim, and…

thepaperscompany/niw-skills · 161 tokens

niw-rfe-response

Works a USCIS Request for Evidence or Notice of Intent to Deny on an EB-2 NIW petition, from reading the notice through to a drafted response. Reads the printed deadline rather than computing one, crosswalks each contested issue against the record as actually filed, stops for the petitioner to correct what it found…

thepaperscompany/niw-skills · 0 tokens

indian-law-defaults

Indian statute and regulatory hierarchy defaults. All agents assume Indian jurisdiction unless overridden. Auto-triggers FEMA for foreign counterparties and SEBI LODR for listed entities.

ishwarjha/legalant · 39 tokens