Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add matematicsolutions/awesome-matematic-skills-pl --skill legal-request-router-plgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/matematicsolutions/awesome-matematic-skills-plWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/matematicsolutions/awesome-matematic-skills-pl/legal-request-router-pl)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/matematicsolutions/awesome-matematic-skills-pl/legal-request-router-pl"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/matematicsolutions/awesome-matematic-skills-pl/legal-request-router-pl/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/matematicsolutions/awesome-matematic-skills-pl/legal-request-router-pl"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/matematicsolutions/awesome-matematic-skills-pl/legal-request-router-pl.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00244 | $0.02026 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00122 | $0.01013 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00049 | $0.00405 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00203 |
Grade A, and why
legal-request-router-pl scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 134 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Legal Request Router PL - klasyfikator i triage zadania prawnego
Filozofia
Nie kazde zapytanie zasluguje na te sama sciezke. Streszczenie wyroku nie potrzebuje kontradyktoryjnej debaty; opinia do klienta nie powinna wyjsc bez weryfikacji cytatow. Router to jedna decyzja podejmowana na wejsciu, ktora dobiera proporcjonalna sciezke - oszczedza tokeny na rutynie i wymusza kontrole tam, gdzie stawka jest wysoka.
Ten skill nie wykonuje pracy prawnej ani weryfikacji. Tylko klasyfikuje i wskazuje, ktore companion-skille uruchomic i w jakiej kolejnosci.
Workflow
- Zbierz sygnaly - typ zapytania, czy jest gotowy deliverable, czy sa cytaty ze zrodel, kto jest odbiorca (klient / sad / wewnetrzne), jaka konsekwencja bledu.
- Sklasyfikuj wg schematu ponizej (LLM zwraca strukture, NIE proza).
- Zmapuj na sciezke wg tabeli decyzyjnej.
- Zwroc decyzje + uzasadnienie + liste skilli do odpalenia w kolejnosci.
Schemat klasyfikacji (output)
{
"typ_zadania": "odpowiedz_bezposrednia | weryfikacja_cytatow | kontrola_adwersaryjna | pelna_sciezka",
"zlozonosc": "niska | srednia | wysoka",
"ryzyko": "niskie | srednie | wysokie",
"ma_cytaty_zrodlowe": true,
"odbiorca": "wewnetrzny | klient | sad | regulator",
"wymaga_groundingu": true,
"wymaga_debaty": false,
"wymaga_paczki_audytowej": false,
"wymaga_pseudonimizacji": true,
"sciezka": ["let-it-be", "citation-grounding-pl"],
"uzasadnienie": "krotko: dlaczego ta sciezka"
}
Tabela decyzyjna
Najpierw typ_zadania (rosnaca intensywnosc kontroli), 1:1 ze sciezka:
| Sygnal wejsciowy | typ_zadania |
Sciezka kontroli |
|---|---|---|
| Brak cytatow, odbiorca wewnetrzny, ryzyko niskie | odpowiedz_bezposrednia |
zadna weryfikacja |
| Sa cytaty ze zrodel (orzeczenie / ustawa / umowa), ale odbiorca wewnetrzny | weryfikacja_cytatow |
citation-grounding-pl |
| Odbiorca klient / sad / regulator, ryzyko srednie+ | kontrola_adwersaryjna |
citation-grounding-pl -> adversarial-legal-review-pl |
| Deliverable wychodzi na zewnatrz, ryzyko wysokie | pelna_sciezka |
grounding -> debata -> legal-ai-audit-bundle |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 134 lines · 244 tokens per session scan A cd7900173701
legal-request-router-pl is a skill published in the GitHub repository matematicsolutions/awesome-matematic-skills-pl (6 stars, last pushed 19d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 244 tokens to every session and 2,026 once invoked, about $0.0012 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
e-signature
Use when wiring an e-signature flow with DocuSign or Dropbox Sign — picking the SES/AES/QES legal tier, sending a PDF or template for signature, embedded signing, verifying signing webhooks, retrieving the signed PDF plus audit trail. NOT drafting contract text (that is contracts), NOT extracting fields from PDFs…
runtime-admissibility-review
Determines whether a specific AI-agent action, output, recommendation, or proposed commitment remains admissible for execution or institutional reliance under current authority, delegated scope, evidence, facts, policy, risk, escalation, and revocation conditions. Use this Skill before an enterprise or regulated AI…
agent-authority-charter-builder-arkadiy-miteiko
Creates an Agent Authority Charter for enterprise or regulated AI agents before deployment. Use this Skill when a user needs to define what an AI agent is allowed to do, who delegated authority to it, what actions are permitted or prohibited, when human approval is required, what evidence must be preserved, and how…
metago-compliance
A pre-task checklist for checking legal, ethical, and security concerns before acting. It covers privacy, copyright, permissions, sensitive data, system safety, and regional compliance requirements.
metago-thought-19-negentropy-engine
A framework for assessing whether a system has a positive or negative effect on social order, information clarity, trust, fairness, and innovation. It uses changes in these areas to discuss social responsibility and ethical risk.
metago-security-engineer
Security Engineer - specializes in security audit, penetration testing, vulnerability management, compliance checking, security design review, supply chain security, and incident response.