Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add matematicsolutions/awesome-matematic-skills-pl --skill legal-request-router-plgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/matematicsolutions/awesome-matematic-skills-plWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/matematicsolutions/awesome-matematic-skills-pl/legal-request-router-pl)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/matematicsolutions/awesome-matematic-skills-pl/legal-request-router-pl"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/matematicsolutions/awesome-matematic-skills-pl/legal-request-router-pl/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/matematicsolutions/awesome-matematic-skills-pl/legal-request-router-pl"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/matematicsolutions/awesome-matematic-skills-pl/legal-request-router-pl.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00244 | $0.02686 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00098 | $0.01074 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00049 | $0.00537 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00269 |
Grade A, and why
legal-request-router-pl scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 21d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 166 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Legal Request Router PL - klasyfikator i triage zadania prawnego
Filozofia
Nie kazde zapytanie zasluguje na te sama sciezke. Streszczenie wyroku nie potrzebuje kontradyktoryjnej debaty; opinia do klienta nie powinna wyjsc bez weryfikacji cytatow. Router to jedna decyzja podejmowana na wejsciu, ktora dobiera proporcjonalna sciezke - oszczedza tokeny na rutynie i wymusza kontrole tam, gdzie stawka jest wysoka.
Ten skill nie wykonuje pracy prawnej ani weryfikacji. Tylko klasyfikuje i wskazuje, ktore companion-skille uruchomic i w jakiej kolejnosci.
Workflow
- Zbierz sygnaly - typ zapytania, czy jest gotowy deliverable, czy sa cytaty ze zrodel, kto jest odbiorca (klient / sad / wewnetrzne), jaka konsekwencja bledu.
- Sklasyfikuj wg schematu ponizej (LLM zwraca strukture, NIE proza).
- Zmapuj na sciezke wg tabeli decyzyjnej.
- Zwroc decyzje + uzasadnienie + liste skilli do odpalenia w kolejnosci.
Schemat klasyfikacji (output)
{
"typ_zadania": "odpowiedz_bezposrednia | weryfikacja_cytatow | kontrola_adwersaryjna | pelna_sciezka",
"zlozonosc": "niska | srednia | wysoka",
"ryzyko": "niskie | srednie | wysokie",
"ma_cytaty_zrodlowe": true,
"odbiorca": "wewnetrzny | klient | sad | regulator",
"wymaga_groundingu": true,
"wymaga_debaty": false,
"wymaga_paczki_audytowej": false,
"wymaga_pseudonimizacji": true,
"sciezka": ["let-it-be", "citation-grounding-pl"],
"uzasadnienie": "krotko: dlaczego ta sciezka"
}
Tabela decyzyjna
Najpierw typ_zadania (rosnaca intensywnosc kontroli), 1:1 ze sciezka:
| Sygnal wejsciowy | typ_zadania |
Sciezka kontroli |
|---|---|---|
| Brak cytatow, odbiorca wewnetrzny, ryzyko niskie | odpowiedz_bezposrednia |
zadna weryfikacja |
| Sa cytaty ze zrodel (orzeczenie / ustawa / umowa), ale odbiorca wewnetrzny | weryfikacja_cytatow |
citation-grounding-pl |
| Odbiorca klient / sad / regulator, ryzyko srednie+ | kontrola_adwersaryjna |
citation-grounding-pl -> adversarial-legal-review-pl |
| Deliverable wychodzi na zewnatrz, ryzyko wysokie | pelna_sciezka |
grounding -> debata -> legal-ai-audit-bundle |
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 21d ago Changed · +32 lines bfc8ae3c8938
- 1mo ago First seen · 134 lines · 244 tokens per session scan A cd7900173701
legal-request-router-pl is a skill published in the GitHub repository matematicsolutions/awesome-matematic-skills-pl (8 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 244 tokens to every session and 2,686 once invoked, about $0.0010 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
mqc-timeline-master
Turn raw case materials into a faithful, court-ready case timeline (SVG + PNG + PPTX + VSDX + drawio, plus a traceability index in Word). Use this whenever the user hands over litigation materials — a judgment, complaint, defence, evidence list, contract, bank or Alipay statement, WeChat screenshots, scanned exhibits…
mqc-litigation-visual-redraw
Redraw a litigation diagram into a restrained, court-ready presentation graphic (SVG + PNG) WITHOUT changing any text or legal meaning. Use this whenever the user supplies a case timeline, a legal process flowchart, OR a party/relationship diagram and wants it cleaned up, beautified, redrawn, made professional…
universal-standards
LegalAnt operating protocol — HITL gates, citation completeness, hallucination defence, Indian law default, data security, and mandatory disclaimer. Applies to every agent on every matter.
niw-package-review
Reviews an assembled EB-2 NIW petition package before filing, as a skeptical adjudicator would. Reads the actual exhibits, recommendation letters and petition draft, tests each Dhanasar prong against the preponderance standard on documented evidence only, quotes the specific petition passages that overclaim, and…
niw-rfe-response
Works a USCIS Request for Evidence or Notice of Intent to Deny on an EB-2 NIW petition, from reading the notice through to a drafted response. Reads the printed deadline rather than computing one, crosswalks each contested issue against the record as actually filed, stops for the petitioner to correct what it found…
indian-law-defaults
Indian statute and regulatory hierarchy defaults. All agents assume Indian jurisdiction unless overridden. Auto-triggers FEMA for foreign counterparties and SEBI LODR for listed entities.