Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add mateusoliveirab/clibridge --skill publish-readygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mateusoliveirab/clibridgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mateusoliveirab/clibridge/publish-ready)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mateusoliveirab/clibridge/publish-ready"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mateusoliveirab/clibridge/publish-ready/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mateusoliveirab/clibridge/publish-ready"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mateusoliveirab/clibridge/publish-ready.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00083 | $0.00842 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00042 | $0.00421 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00168 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00084 |
Grade A, and why
publish-ready scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 61 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Publish Ready
Act as a skeptical external open-source developer arriving cold to inspect this repository before it is released to the public. Your job is to enforce absolute portability, security, and professional packaging.
Verdict is binary: READY TO PUBLISH or NEEDS CLEANUP.
Process Loop
When triggered, you must execute these four steps in order:
1. Diagnostic Scan
Do not guess. Programmatically scan the workspace using the following commands:
- Paths Audit: Run
grep -rn "/home/" --exclude-dir=node_modules --exclude-dir=.git .to find hardcoded user paths. - Secrets Audit: Run
grep -rn "API_KEY\|SECRET\|TOKEN\|PASSWORD\|CREDENTIALS" --exclude-dir=node_modules --exclude-dir=.git .to locate credentials. - Packaging Audit: Check for
LICENSE,README.md,package.json,tsconfig.json,.gitignore,CHANGELOG.md, andCONTRIBUTING.md. - Version Audit: Compare the version field in
package.jsonandpackage-lock.jsonand ensure they match. Check ifCHANGELOG.mdcontains the version string.
2. Evaluate Quality Lenses
- L1: Environment Hygiene (Blocking) — Zero absolute paths (
/home/...), zero system-specific usernames, and zero credentials checked into source control or configuration files. - L2: Distribution Standards (Blocking) — A valid
LICENSEexists.package.jsoncontains valid description, author, repository URL, bugs, and homepage metadata. - L3: Build Integrity (Warning) — TypeScript checks compile strictly (
tsconfig.jsonlacksallowJsorcheckJsbypasses), tests pass cleanly, and.gitignorecovers local run files. - L4: Onboarding Portability (Warning) — Setup steps are machine-agnostic. No references to internal servers or local dev environments.
- L5: Release & Versioning Hygiene (Blocking/Warning) — The version field follows SemVer.
package.jsonversion matchespackage-lock.jsonexactly.CHANGELOG.mdcontains release notes matching the current version. - L6: Community Packaging (Warning) —
CONTRIBUTING.mdis present.package.jsoncontains a"files"declaration defining the whitelist of distributed files.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 61 lines · 83 tokens per session scan A a9f5476fa5ca
publish-ready is a skill published in the GitHub repository mateusoliveirab/clibridge (0 stars, last pushed 25d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 83 tokens to every session and 842 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
github
GitHub via gh CLI: PRs, issues, reviews, repos, auth.
github
Full GitHub CLI control — issues, PRs, code reviews, repo management. Uses gh CLI with auth detection, rate limiting, and templates. Triggers on: github, issue, pull request, PR, code review, repo, branch, label, assignee, milestone, release, workflow, actions.
release
Release gentle-pi through GitHub and npm. Trigger: release, publish, npm publish, GitHub release, version bump.
pre-publish-review
Nuclear-grade 12-agent pre-publish release gate. Runs /get-unpublished-changes to detect all changes since last npm release, spawns up to 10 ultrabrain agents for deep per-change analysis, invokes /review-work (orchestrator manual QA plus one gate reviewer) for holistic review, and 1 oracle for overall release…
parallel-pr-review
Use when asked to "review the open PRs", review a batch or stack of pull requests, or run a recurring PR-review pass on a repo — especially with many PRs, stacked branches, conflicts, or security-sensitive changes. Covers grouping, fan-out to review subagents, verdict synthesis, and posting.
release
Cut a brooks-lint release: set the version in package.json, propagate it across all four plugin manifests and every version-bearing text file (README badges, docs site metadata), write the CHANGELOG entry, validate, then commit, push, tag, and publish the GitHub release. Triggers when the maintainer asks to "release"…