Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/MatrixFounder/Agentic-developmentnpx agentmods add skills/matrixfounder/agentic-development/run-feedbackWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/matrixfounder/agentic-development/run-feedback)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/matrixfounder/agentic-development/run-feedback"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/matrixfounder/agentic-development/run-feedback/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/matrixfounder/agentic-development/run-feedback"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/matrixfounder/agentic-development/run-feedback.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00110 | $0.06771 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00044 | $0.02708 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.01354 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00677 |
Grade A, and why
run-feedback scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 341 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Run Feedback
Purpose: Errors from runs evaporate today — a gate fails, gets retried, and the knowledge dies
with the session. This skill closes the loop: deterministic capture (retro step, hooks, transcript
miner) → LLM triage → deterministic filing into the existing ledgers, both of them
thin indexes over record files per known-issues-format: defects to docs/issues/ +
docs/KNOWN_ISSUES.md, work-items to docs/backlog/ + docs/BACKLOG.md. Filed issues marked
auto_fixable: true feed the /heal-issues harness. Machine state lives under the gitignored
.agent/feedback/; the repo-visible trace is the ledgers themselves.
1. Red Flags (Anti-Rationalization)
STOP and READ THIS if you are thinking:
- "I'll append a line to KNOWN_ISSUES.md without creating the issue file" -> WRONG. Lockstep or
nothing — the
filesubcommand writes both or neither, for both ledgers. Never hand-edit one side. Scope of this ban: record files and the index's- **ID**pointer lines. The prefix→category TABLE row in the index preamble is the ONE hand-edit that is yours (§7 step 6) — the script cannot write it. - "A work-item is small, its body can just live in the backlog index line" -> WRONG. Both
indexes are pointer indexes: one line per record, body in
docs/backlog/<slug>.md. An inlined body is how a single entry once reached 7 849 characters — unreadable, undiffable, impossible to close in parts. If a repo really runs a one-file backlog (backlog_layout: "flat"), the engine REFUSES a body it would have to flatten; do not "fix" that by squashing your body into one line — switch the layout or file the body where it belongs. - "This finding is obviously a dup, I'll file it anyway for completeness" -> WRONG. A duplicate
goes to
--as noise --reason "duplicate of <ID>"; the recurrence is already counted by the fingerprint merge. - "I'll classify straight from the inbox JSON without running
triage" -> WRONG. Dup candidates come from the script (fingerprint + title overlap). Eyeballing misses them. - "I'll invent severity
HIGH/ statushandledfor a new issue" -> WRONG. The write vocabulary is owned byknown-issues-format(SEV-2/3/4/LOW;open/fixed/documented/by-design/mitigated/wontfix). Reading tolerates local extensions; writing never emits them. - "The filing is simple, I'll skip
--dry-run" -> WRONG. Dry-run first, always — it previews the allocated ID and the exact index line; a mis-filed ID pollutes a hand-maintained ledger. - "I'll edit a finding JSON in the inbox by hand" -> WRONG. Only the CLI mutates inbox state; hand edits break fingerprint dedup and the audit trail.
- "The body I just filed came out malformed, I'll fix the issue file" -> WRONG. Ledger writes are
create-only, so a filed body cannot be repaired. The gate now catches the two failures that used to
land silently (RF-2,
fixed): an unterminated fence and a defect body with no
## Reproductionsection are refused at exit 4, and--dry-runechoes the rendered record so you can read the body before it lands. Still compose in a REAL file rather than a heredoc you cannot re-read — the gate checks structure, not whether the prose is right. Landed broken → leave it, tell the human. - "The retro step failed, I should retry it / fail the workflow" -> WRONG. The retro is non-blocking by contract: report one line and move on; it NEVER changes the calling workflow's verdict.
What ships with it
60 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- assets/templates/feedback_config_template.json 412 B
- assets/templates/heal_config_template.json 680 B
- assets/templates/issue_body_template.md 931 B
- assets/templates/work_item_body_template.md 1.7 KB
- evals/_hashes.py 4.5 KB runs code
- evals/analyze_rules.py 6.8 KB runs code
- evals/build_all.py 2.4 KB runs code
- evals/evals.json 68 KB
- evals/grade_all.py 2.7 KB runs code
- evals/grade_run.py 32 KB runs code
- evals/harness.py 17 KB runs code
- evals/pinned/iteration-5-v1.2/benchmark.json 100 KB
- evals/pinned/iteration-5-v1.2/benchmark.md 424 B
- evals/pinned/iteration-5-v1.2/PROVENANCE.txt 624 B
- evals/pinned/iteration-5-v1.2/runs/eval-1/eval_metadata.json 934 B
- evals/pinned/iteration-5-v1.2/runs/eval-1/with_skill/run-1/grading.json 2.5 KB
- evals/pinned/iteration-5-v1.2/runs/eval-1/with_skill/run-2/grading.json 2.5 KB
- evals/pinned/iteration-5-v1.2/runs/eval-1/without_skill/run-1/grading.json 4.2 KB
- evals/pinned/iteration-5-v1.2/runs/eval-1/without_skill/run-2/grading.json 3.4 KB
- evals/pinned/iteration-5-v1.2/runs/eval-10/eval_metadata.json 1.1 KB
- evals/pinned/iteration-5-v1.2/runs/eval-10/with_skill/run-1/grading.json 21 KB
- evals/pinned/iteration-5-v1.2/runs/eval-10/with_skill/run-2/grading.json 18 KB
- evals/pinned/iteration-5-v1.2/runs/eval-10/without_skill/run-1/grading.json 6.8 KB
- evals/pinned/iteration-5-v1.2/runs/eval-10/without_skill/run-2/grading.json 5.0 KB
- evals/pinned/iteration-5-v1.2/runs/eval-11/eval_metadata.json 776 B
- evals/pinned/iteration-5-v1.2/runs/eval-11/with_skill/run-1/grading.json 2.4 KB
- evals/pinned/iteration-5-v1.2/runs/eval-11/with_skill/run-2/grading.json 2.7 KB
- evals/pinned/iteration-5-v1.2/runs/eval-11/without_skill/run-1/grading.json 4.1 KB
- evals/pinned/iteration-5-v1.2/runs/eval-11/without_skill/run-2/grading.json 4.3 KB
- evals/pinned/iteration-5-v1.2/runs/eval-12/eval_metadata.json 905 B
- evals/pinned/iteration-5-v1.2/runs/eval-12/with_skill/run-1/grading.json 4.8 KB
- evals/pinned/iteration-5-v1.2/runs/eval-12/with_skill/run-2/grading.json 2.7 KB
- evals/pinned/iteration-5-v1.2/runs/eval-12/without_skill/run-1/grading.json 3.1 KB
- evals/pinned/iteration-5-v1.2/runs/eval-12/without_skill/run-2/grading.json 4.5 KB
- evals/pinned/iteration-5-v1.2/runs/eval-13/eval_metadata.json 804 B
- evals/pinned/iteration-5-v1.2/runs/eval-13/with_skill/run-1/grading.json 1.9 KB
- evals/pinned/iteration-5-v1.2/runs/eval-13/with_skill/run-2/grading.json 2.3 KB
- evals/pinned/iteration-5-v1.2/runs/eval-13/without_skill/run-1/grading.json 3.0 KB
- evals/pinned/iteration-5-v1.2/runs/eval-13/without_skill/run-2/grading.json 3.4 KB
- evals/pinned/iteration-5-v1.2/runs/eval-14/eval_metadata.json 886 B
- evals/pinned/iteration-5-v1.2/runs/eval-14/with_skill/run-1/grading.json 3.0 KB
- evals/pinned/iteration-5-v1.2/runs/eval-14/with_skill/run-2/grading.json 2.9 KB
- evals/pinned/iteration-5-v1.2/runs/eval-14/without_skill/run-1/grading.json 3.7 KB
- evals/pinned/iteration-5-v1.2/runs/eval-14/without_skill/run-2/grading.json 4.3 KB
- evals/pinned/iteration-5-v1.2/runs/eval-15/eval_metadata.json 742 B
- evals/pinned/iteration-5-v1.2/runs/eval-15/with_skill/run-1/grading.json 2.6 KB
- evals/pinned/iteration-5-v1.2/runs/eval-15/with_skill/run-2/grading.json 2.4 KB
- evals/pinned/iteration-5-v1.2/runs/eval-15/without_skill/run-1/grading.json 2.8 KB
- evals/pinned/iteration-5-v1.2/runs/eval-15/without_skill/run-2/grading.json 2.7 KB
- evals/pinned/iteration-5-v1.2/runs/eval-16/eval_metadata.json 813 B
- evals/pinned/iteration-5-v1.2/runs/eval-16/with_skill/run-1/grading.json 2.7 KB
- evals/pinned/iteration-5-v1.2/runs/eval-16/with_skill/run-2/grading.json 2.6 KB
- evals/pinned/iteration-5-v1.2/runs/eval-16/without_skill/run-1/grading.json 3.6 KB
- evals/pinned/iteration-5-v1.2/runs/eval-16/without_skill/run-2/grading.json 2.9 KB
- evals/pinned/iteration-5-v1.2/runs/eval-17/eval_metadata.json 1.1 KB
- evals/pinned/iteration-5-v1.2/runs/eval-17/with_skill/run-1/grading.json 3.0 KB
- evals/pinned/iteration-5-v1.2/runs/eval-17/with_skill/run-2/grading.json 3.2 KB
- evals/pinned/iteration-5-v1.2/runs/eval-17/without_skill/run-1/grading.json 4.8 KB
- evals/pinned/iteration-5-v1.2/runs/eval-17/without_skill/run-2/grading.json 4.2 KB
- evals/pinned/iteration-5-v1.2/runs/eval-2/eval_metadata.json 978 B
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago Changed · +4 lines 0deaa1a8e076
- 20d ago Changed · +5 lines 8c6e0abff20e
- 1mo ago Changed · +7 lines 92317104e0ee
- 1mo ago First seen · 325 lines · 110 tokens per session scan A 1e8bf03e04bd
run-feedback is a skill published in the GitHub repository MatrixFounder/Agentic-development (6 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 110 tokens to every session and 6,771 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
Pair Programming
AI-assisted pair programming with multiple modes (driver/navigator/switch), real-time verification, quality monitoring, and comprehensive testing. Supports TDD, debugging, refactoring, and learning sessions. Features automatic role switching, continuous code review, security scanning, and performance optimization with…
conductor-implement
Execute tasks from a track's implementation plan following TDD workflow.
user-story-writer
Escribir historias de usuario bien estructuradas con criterios de aceptación y casos extremos. Úsalo cuando te pidan escribir historias de usuario, crear tickets a partir de un resumen de características, convertir un PRD en historias o redactar criterios de aceptación. Produce historias listas para estimar en formato…
gh-issue
Size-audit, write, and split BanyanDB issues that somebody else or an automated TDD workflow can implement. Use whenever the user asks to file or revise an issue, decide whether an issue is too large, make an issue TDD-ready, turn a design into tickets, or split an umbrella into executable leaves. Do not draft or file…
implement-feature
Implement an approved feature plan with fresh-context slices, TDD, revision-bound evidence, and PR-ready output.
08-three-amigos
Assesses an Epic or Story through one product, delivery, or quality lens, then reconciles three caller-supplied reports. Use when the user wants to refine one before a backlog change. Not for spawning or writing.