analysis

analysis is a skill for Claude Code from matteocervelli/llms. It costs 31 tokens per session (1,108 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A planning and analysis workflow for understanding a feature request, its dependencies, technical fit, security concerns, and scope.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to assess feature requests from GitHub issues and produce requirements, acceptance criteria, implementation considerations, and risk notes.
Why use it?
It helps reveal unclear requirements, compatibility problems, risks, and related work before implementation begins.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter.

Good fit Use it to assess feature requests from GitHub issues and produce requirements, acceptance criteria, implementation considerations, and risk notes.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/matteocervelli/llms/analysis
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add matteocervelli/llms --skill analysis
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/matteocervelli/llms

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for analysis

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/matteocervelli/llms/analysis/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/matteocervelli/llms/analysis)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/matteocervelli/llms/analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/matteocervelli/llms/analysis/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for analysis

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/matteocervelli/llms/analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/matteocervelli/llms/analysis.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 31 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,108 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00031 $0.01108
Opus 5.5 $0.00012 $0.00443
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00006 $0.00222
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00111

Measured 1mo ago against content hash d593678719c7, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

The scan reads SKILL.md. This mod also ships 1 executable file (scripts/analyze_deps.py), listed below but not scanned — reading those needs a real analyzer, not pattern matching.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.archive/builders/tools/skill_builder/templates/analysis/SKILL.md · 204 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 204 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Feature Analysis Skill

Purpose

This skill provides systematic analysis of feature requirements from GitHub issues, evaluating technical feasibility, dependencies, security implications, and implementation scope.

When to Use

  • Starting feature implementation from a GitHub issue
  • Need to understand requirements and acceptance criteria
  • Evaluating technical approach and dependencies
  • Identifying security considerations early
  • Scoping effort and potential risks

Analysis Workflow

1. Requirements Extraction

From GitHub Issue:

  • Parse issue title, description, and acceptance criteria
  • Extract functional and non-functional requirements
  • Identify user stories and use cases
  • Review issue comments for clarifications
  • Check linked issues and dependencies

Deliverable: Structured requirements list with priorities

2. Technical Stack Evaluation

Assess Technology Fit:

  • Review project's TECH-STACK.md for current technologies
  • Identify required libraries/frameworks
  • Check version compatibility
  • Evaluate performance implications
  • Consider maintenance burden

Tools to Use:

  • Read TECH-STACK.md and relevant documentation
  • Use scripts/analyze_deps.py for dependency analysis
  • Grep codebase for similar patterns

Deliverable: Technology recommendations with rationale

3. Dependency Analysis

Identify Dependencies:

  • External libraries (pip/npm/cargo packages)
  • Internal modules and services
  • Database schema changes
  • API contracts
  • Configuration requirements

Check for Conflicts:

# Use the analyze_deps script
python scripts/analyze_deps.py --feature <feature-name>

Deliverable: Dependency map with conflict analysis

4. Security Assessment

Review Security Implications:

  • Authentication/authorization requirements
  • Input validation needs
  • Data sensitivity (PII, credentials, etc.)
  • API security (rate limiting, CORS, etc.)
  • Dependency vulnerabilities

Use Checklist: Refer to security-checklist.md for systematic review

Read the full file on GitHub · 204 lines

Files

What ships with it

3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 204 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A d593678719c7

Subscribe to this mod's changes

analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository matteocervelli/llms (25 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 1,108 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-01.