Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to matteocervelli/llms. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/matteocervelli/llms/main/.claude/skills/review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/matteocervelli/llmsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/matteocervelli/llms/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/matteocervelli/llms/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/matteocervelli/llms/review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00084 | $0.03168 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00042 | $0.01584 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00634 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00317 |
Grade B, and why
review scanned grade B with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Reads agent configuration directoriesmediumAgent snooping
.claude/, .codex/, .gemini/ hold keys, settings and other credentials a mod has no legitimate need for.
cat "$HOME/.claude/shared/companions/registry.json" | jq -r ".companions.$COMPANION.installed" How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 303 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Review — Companion-Dispatched Reviews & Analysis
Unified skill for all companion AI reviews. Dispatches structured prompts to external AIs (Codex, Gemini, Claude) via runner.sh for independent second opinions.
For Claude-native code quality checks (no external AI), use /code-review.
Usage
/review # Auto-detect: uncommitted changes → changes review
/review changes # Full review: code + silent-failures + types + comments
/review changes --quick # Code review only (skip silent-failures/types/comments)
/review pr [--pr N] # PR merge readiness (MERGE/BLOCK verdict)
/review doc <file> # PRP/PRD/RFC/Design completeness review
/review solve "problem" # Architecture/design second opinion
/review status <spec> # Implementation progress vs spec
/review frontend <url> # Delegates to /frontend review
/review silent-failures [file|diff] # Error handling audit
/review types [file] # Type design analysis
/review comments [file] # Comment accuracy check
/review gate # Lightweight pre-commit gate (critical bugs + security only)
/review adversarial # Adversarial review: challenge design choices (Codex gpt-5.5 xhigh)
All subcommands support: [companion] (codex/gemini/claude), --model MODEL, --all, --exclude-self
Workflow
Step 1: Parse Arguments
Parse $ARGUMENTS for subcommand and flags:
- First positional arg → subcommand (changes, pr, doc, solve, status, frontend, silent-failures, types, comments, gate, adversarial)
- If no subcommand: check for uncommitted changes → default to
changes, else show usage - Companion name: codex, gemini, or claude (optional, resolved from registry defaults)
--model MODEL→ override default model--base BRANCH→ diff against branch (for changes/pr)--pr NUMBER→ GitHub PR mode (for pr subcommand)--context FILE→ attach context files (for solve)--type PRP|PRD|RFC|DESIGN→ doc type override (for doc)--issue NUMBER→ GitHub issue (for status)--timeout SECS→ override default timeout--all→ dispatch to all installed companions in parallel--exclude-self→ exclude claude from--allruns--quick→ code review only (for changes: skip silent-failures/types/comments checks)
What ships with it
9 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 303 lines · 84 tokens per session scan B a66a8252eaaf
review is a skill published in the GitHub repository matteocervelli/llms (25 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 84 tokens to every session and 3,168 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it B with 1 finding (reads agent configuration directories). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
rework-rate
Measure and interpret PR rework rate — the emerging 5th DORA metric.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…