Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add matteoroversi/lookward --skill lw-capturegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/matteoroversi/lookwardWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/matteoroversi/lookward/lw-capture)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/matteoroversi/lookward/lw-capture"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/matteoroversi/lookward/lw-capture/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/matteoroversi/lookward/lw-capture"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/matteoroversi/lookward/lw-capture.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00065 | $0.00844 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00026 | $0.00338 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00169 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00084 |
Grade A, and why
lw-capture scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 54 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
lw-capture
Append a signal to the world model's sources/ — immutable, append-only, provenance-stamped. This skill is the record primitive of the living loop — mostly invisible: the connectors (forged by lw-forge) and the surface automations (the Claude Code hook, the claude.ai routine) call it; you rarely invoke it by hand. When you do invoke it directly — /lw-capture with a paste or a file — it writes one immutable digest capture to sources/ and stops there. It does not create or edit knowledge nodes and does not consolidate — that is lw-enrich (propose-don't-apply). Loads ontology/contract.md.
What it writes — a capture (a source node)
One markdown file per signal, under sources/<channel>/…, with frontmatter:
---
id: <stable id — derived from the source's native id, so re-runs don't duplicate>
type: source
title: <human label for the signal>
timestamp: <when the signal happened, ISO 8601>
resource: <link or native id of the original — the system of record>
lookward:
world_model: <wm name>
purpose: "raw capture of a <source kind>"
face: self
visibility: private # default private (Rule 3)
provenance: connector # connector | upload | reflection | session
confidence: high
capture:
surface: <claude.ai | claude-code | …>
source_kind: <session-transcript | message | file | …>
source_id: <native id>
pull_run: <ISO date of this capture run>
---
# Faithful digest of the signal — topics, decisions, artifacts produced, open items,
# entities mentioned. Every claim traceable to `resource`. Nothing invented (citation invariant).
Rules (from the contract)
- Append-only & immutable. Never edit or overwrite a prior capture. Re-running is idempotent: if a capture for this
source_idalready exists, skip it. - Faithful, not invented. The digest reflects only what the signal contains; it cites the source. No consolidation, no interpretation into nodes.
- Default private.
visibility: privateunless the user has set otherwise. - Provenance always. Stamp surface, source kind, source id, and pull-run.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 54 lines · 65 tokens per session scan A 6ee7e6d78154
lw-capture is a skill published in the GitHub repository matteoroversi/lookward (7 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 65 tokens to every session and 844 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
lw-capture compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| lw-capturematteoroversi/lookward | Skill | 7 | 4mo ago | MIT | A | 65 | Claude Code |
| knowledge-ingestopenclaw/openclaw | Skill | 394k | yesterday | MIT | A | 80 | Claude Code, Codex |
| mem0-oss-to-platformmem0ai/mem0 | Skill | 68k | 2d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 217 | Claude Code, Codex |
| forgetasgeirtj/system_prompts_leaks | Skill | 71k | 2d ago | CC0-1.0 | A | 74 | Claude Code, Codex |
| Cortexdanielmiessler/LifeOS | Skill | 20k | yesterday | MIT | A | 184 | Claude Code |
| memoryopensquilla/opensquilla | Skill | 7.1k | 6d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 44 | Claude Code, Codex |
| ha-data-storesshiwenwen/hope-agent | Skill | 1.9k | yesterday | MIT | A | 115 | Claude Code, Codex |