Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add matteoroversi/lookward --skill lw-lintgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/matteoroversi/lookwardWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/matteoroversi/lookward/lw-lint)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/matteoroversi/lookward/lw-lint"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/matteoroversi/lookward/lw-lint/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/matteoroversi/lookward/lw-lint"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/matteoroversi/lookward/lw-lint.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00064 | $0.01190 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00595 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00238 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00119 |
Grade A, and why
lw-lint scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 45 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
lw-lint
Validate the world model. Mechanical and quiet (not a conversational skill). Loads ontology/contract.md. Runs lint.py for the deterministic frontmatter/schema checks; reasons over the report for the heavier multi-file ones. Every defect caught by hand becomes a new rule here — the rule set grows from real failures, not imagined risks.
Severity = the gate model (from the contract): blocker/major are Violation — they gate the push (exit 2/1); minor is Warning/Info — a proposal that does not gate (exit 0). The human approves the proposals; only Violations block.
Two tiers, honestly scoped:
- Enforced by
lint.pytoday — per-node frontmatter (required keys incl.lookward.world_model/visibility,idpresent & a stable slug-or-ULID, type validity vs seed/special/promoted,purpose, and theprovenance/visibility/face/confidenceenums),statuslifecycle + tombstone integrity (deprecated→replaced_by), connector freshness (last_synced), boundary keys incl. mandatorylookward.statement+ thekind/strength/enforcerenums, the will-chain on thelookward.rootnode, exactly-one-root, duplicate-id (ablocker), root-exists / non-empty, the spine-gate (a node of a promoted type requiresontology.mdto exist and declare that type — the static proxy for "spine before nodes"), andontology.mdversion (anchored to aversion:key orvN.N, not any bare decimal). - Reasoned by the skill (not deterministic) — links/orphans, citation invariant, the Kitchen-Sink mirror check (object types must model real-world concepts, not copy a source's columns 1:1 — a modeling judgement, not a static one), the kinetic action-contract validity (each action in
ontology.mdcarriesparameters/rules/submission_criteria/side_effects/execution;rulesfrom the closed catalog;execution: autoonly on read-only verbs), identifier-reuse, God-Object accretion, health metrics, rebuildability. - Planned, NOT yet enforced (post-v0) — the visibility/audience push gate, the block-level projection leak-check, typed-relation target resolution (the
relations:list-of-objects schema), anddatasource:validation. These depend on the projection generator / a richer parser, which v0 does not build. Do not rely on them as enforced until shipped.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 45 lines · 64 tokens per session scan A aa790792db95
lw-lint is a skill published in the GitHub repository matteoroversi/lookward (7 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 64 tokens to every session and 1,190 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
research-engineer
An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.
tika-eval-compare
Compare extracts from two Tika builds over a corpus to detect regressions in content, encoding, exceptions, and embedded-document handling. Use for "compare before/after extracts", "eval this change against the corpus".
neuron-evaluation-engineer
Create and run AI evaluations with datasets, assertions, and output drivers in Neuron AI. Use this skill whenever the user mentions evaluation, testing AI systems, creating evaluators, dataset-driven testing, assertion-based validation, or wants to measure AI system performance. Also trigger for tasks involving…
jetson-validate-image
Use after jetson-flash-image to run static BSP checks, on-target smoke/regression tests on a flashed DUT, or both. Not for build or flash steps. Triggers: validate bsp, on-target validation.
atmos-validation
Validate Atmos projects, components, arbitrary JSON Schema inputs, EditorConfig, and GitHub Actions; use affected-file selection and native CI annotations.
skill-benchmark
Benchmark AI skill effectiveness by measuring implementation quality against legacy constraints.