lotti: Skill for Claude Code

.claude/skills/design-review-panel/SKILL.md

design-review-panel is a skill for Claude Code from matthiasn/lotti. It costs 116 tokens per session (1,499 once invoked), scanned A, original, GPL-3.0.

A design-review process for checking a user-interface screen with screenshots and several reviewing agents. It can also include user personas, which represent different kinds of users.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review a UI surface, compare before-and-after screenshots, and assess different aspects of its design.
Why use it?
It helps identify visual and usability problems and check whether later changes improve the screen.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: argument-hint in frontmatter.

This is matthiasn/lotti's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on lotti itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything lotti configures →

About the project

Lotti is a private logbook that stores tasks, time records, notes, habits, and health data on a person's devices, with personal AI assistants that summarize records and suggest changes for approval. It is for people who want to track intended and completed work while keeping synchronized data end-to-end encrypted. The catalogue add-ons provide agents, skills, and instructions for working with Lotti.

matthiasn/lotti · 1,173 stars · on GitHub · matthiasn.github.io

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to matthiasn/lotti. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/matthiasn/lotti/main/.claude/skills/design-review-panel/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/matthiasn/lotti

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for design-review-panel

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/matthiasn/lotti/design-review-panel/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/matthiasn/lotti/design-review-panel)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/matthiasn/lotti/design-review-panel"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/matthiasn/lotti/design-review-panel/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for design-review-panel

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/matthiasn/lotti/design-review-panel"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/matthiasn/lotti/design-review-panel.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 116 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,499 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00116 $0.01499
Opus 5 $0.00058 $0.00749
Sonnet 5 $0.00023 $0.00300
Haiku 4.5 $0.00012 $0.00150

Measured 11d ago against content hash 42cb65e95d73, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

design-review-panel scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

The scan reads SKILL.md. This mod also ships 1 executable file (panel_workflow.js), listed below but not scanned — reading those needs a real analyzer, not pattern matching.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/skills/design-review-panel/SKILL.md · 117 lines

The source is not reproduced here

Licensed GPL-3.0

The repository is licensed GPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.

Read it on GitHub

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago First seen · 117 lines · 116 tokens per session scan A 42cb65e95d73

Subscribe to this mod's changes

design-review-panel is a skill published in the GitHub repository matthiasn/lotti (1,173 stars, last pushed today), licensed GPL-3.0. It adds 116 tokens to every session and 1,499 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories