Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add mattmre/EVOKORE-MCP-PUBLIC --skill agentic-jujutsugit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mattmre/EVOKORE-MCP-PUBLICWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mattmre/evokore-mcp-public/agentic-jujutsu)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mattmre/evokore-mcp-public/agentic-jujutsu"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mattmre/evokore-mcp-public/agentic-jujutsu/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mattmre/evokore-mcp-public/agentic-jujutsu"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mattmre/evokore-mcp-public/agentic-jujutsu.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00050 | $0.01446 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00025 | $0.00723 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00289 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00145 |
Grade A, and why
agentic-jujutsu scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 138 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Agentic Jujutsu Skill
Coordinates concurrent multi-agent writes to a single git repository without traditional file locking. Agents register soft claims through ClaimsManager, fan out into isolated worktree branches, and reconverge via semantic 3-way merge. Benchmarked at ~87% auto-conflict resolution on the EVOKORE corpus; the remaining 13% route to manual escalation with structured context.
Trigger
Use this skill when:
- Orchestrating 3+ agents writing to overlapping code paths in the same session
- Fan-out / fan-in workflows (e.g. architect → 5 implementers → reviewer) are hitting
.git/index.lockcollisions - Agents are stomping on each other's commits mid-squash
- A merge wave has produced more conflicts than it resolved and you need a replayable strategy
Core Principle
Claim first, write second, merge semantically. Locking is replaced with cooperative soft claims that record intent. If two agents claim overlapping regions, the later claim is told upfront (not after a wasted write) and can either wait, re-scope, or route to a different branch.
Claim Protocol
Every agent invokes claim_acquire before editing. Claims are scoped to {path, range?, intent} and held by session ID.
// Agent A: claim exclusive write on a function range
{
"tool": "claim_acquire",
"arguments": {
"path": "src/ProxyManager.ts",
"range": { "startLine": 120, "endLine": 210 },
"intent": "refactor:hashmap-lookup",
"ttlMs": 900000
}
}
// Agent B: overlapping claim returns conflict with holder info
{
"tool": "claim_acquire",
"arguments": {
"path": "src/ProxyManager.ts",
"range": { "startLine": 180, "endLine": 260 },
"intent": "add:connection-pool"
}
}
// → { ok: false, conflict: { holder: "agent-a", intent: "refactor:hashmap-lookup", expiresAt: ... } }
Release on completion (success or abort):
{ "tool": "claim_release", "arguments": { "claimId": "clm_7h2..." } }
List active claims to debug stalls:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 138 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A 4692942d887a
agentic-jujutsu is a skill published in the GitHub repository mattmre/EVOKORE-MCP-PUBLIC (3 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 1,446 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
agent-framework-py-release
Use when cutting a Python release for the microsoft/agent-framework monorepo. Triggers on "bump py versions", "cut a python release", "prepare release PR for python", "release py packages", "bump python to X.Y.Z", or similar requests to bump Python package versions and prepare a release PR. Handles all four lifecycle…
agent-orchestrator
Meta-skill que orquestra todos os agentes do ecossistema. Scan automatico de skills, match por capacidades, coordenacao de workflows multi-skill e registry management.
python-package-management
Guide for managing packages in the Agent Framework Python monorepo, including creating new connector packages, versioning, and the lazy-loading pattern. Use this when adding, modifying, or releasing packages.
foundry-hosted-agent-validation
Step-by-step process for validating a Python Foundry hosted agent sample (under python/samples/04-hosting/foundry-hosted-agents/) end to end — running it locally (native runtime and azd ai agent run) and after deploying it to an Azure AI Foundry project with azd. Use this when asked to validate a hosted agent sample.
verify-samples-tool
How to use the verify-samples tool to run, verify, and manage sample definitions in the Agent Framework repository. Use this when adding, updating, or running sample verification.
python-feature-lifecycle
Guidance for package and feature lifecycle in the Agent Framework Python codebase, including stage meanings, feature-stage decorators, feature enums, and how to move APIs from one stage to the next.