Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add mattmre/EVOKORE-MCP-PUBLIC --skill debugging-strategiesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mattmre/EVOKORE-MCP-PUBLICWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mattmre/evokore-mcp-public/debugging-strategies)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mattmre/evokore-mcp-public/debugging-strategies"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mattmre/evokore-mcp-public/debugging-strategies/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mattmre/evokore-mcp-public/debugging-strategies"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mattmre/evokore-mcp-public/debugging-strategies.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00043 | $0.03028 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.01514 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00606 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00303 |
Grade A, and why
debugging-strategies scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
95% identical to debugging-strategies — 14 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 540 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Debugging Strategies
Transform debugging from frustrating guesswork into systematic problem-solving with proven strategies, powerful tools, and methodical approaches.
When to Use This Skill
- Tracking down elusive bugs
- Investigating performance issues
- Understanding unfamiliar codebases
- Debugging production issues
- Analyzing crash dumps and stack traces
- Profiling application performance
- Investigating memory leaks
- Debugging distributed systems
Core Principles
1. The Scientific Method
1. Observe: What's the actual behavior? 2. Hypothesize: What could be causing it? 3. Experiment: Test your hypothesis 4. Analyze: Did it prove/disprove your theory? 5. Repeat: Until you find the root cause
2. Debugging Mindset
Don't Assume:
- "It can't be X" - Yes it can
- "I didn't change Y" - Check anyway
- "It works on my machine" - Find out why
Do:
- Reproduce consistently
- Isolate the problem
- Keep detailed notes
- Question everything
- Take breaks when stuck
3. Rubber Duck Debugging
Explain your code and problem out loud (to a rubber duck, colleague, or yourself). Often reveals the issue.
Systematic Debugging Process
Phase 1: Reproduce
## Reproduction Checklist
1. **Can you reproduce it?**
- Always? Sometimes? Randomly?
- Specific conditions needed?
- Can others reproduce it?
2. **Create minimal reproduction**
- Simplify to smallest example
- Remove unrelated code
- Isolate the problem
3. **Document steps**
- Write down exact steps
- Note environment details
- Capture error messages
Phase 2: Gather Information
## Information Collection
1. **Error Messages**
- Full stack trace
- Error codes
- Console/log output
2. **Environment**
- OS version
- Language/runtime version
- Dependencies versions
- Environment variables
3. **Recent Changes**
- Git history
- Deployment timeline
- Configuration changes
4. **Scope**
- Affects all users or specific ones?
- All browsers or specific ones?
- Production only or also dev?
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 540 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A 358a0b8676d4
debugging-strategies is a skill published in the GitHub repository mattmre/EVOKORE-MCP-PUBLIC (3 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 3,028 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 95% identical to debugging-strategies, differing in 14 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
bug-hunter
Use this skill when scanning source code for bugs, anti-patterns, code smells, or quality issues in a WrongStack project. Trigger on the explicit vocabulary — "bug", "bug hunt", "scan for issues", "find problems", "anti-pattern", "code smell", "static analysis" — and on the task shape, which is how it usually arrives…
observability
Use this skill when instrumenting logs, traces, or metrics in WrongStack, or when setting up observability for a new feature. Triggers: user says "log", "trace", "metrics", "observability", "instrument", "structured logging", "opentelemetry", "log level", "debug", "monitoring".
harness-doctor
Check whether this project's Agentsmith harness is installed correctly and healthy — fires on "is my harness set up right?", "harness doctor", "check my harness". Part of the Agentsmith harness; checks each selected agent's managed rules, settings, skills, hooks, verification, and leanness with a one-line fix for each…
deobfuscating-powershell-obfuscated-malware
Systematically deobfuscate multi-layer PowerShell malware using AST analysis, dynamic tracing, and tools like PSDecode and PowerDecode to reveal hidden payloads and C2 infrastructure.
detecting-process-injection-techniques
Detects and analyzes process injection techniques used by malware including classic DLL injection, process hollowing, APC injection, thread hijacking, and reflective loading. Uses memory forensics, API monitoring, and behavioral analysis to identify injection artifacts. Activates for requests involving process…
hunting-for-anomalous-powershell-execution
Hunt for malicious PowerShell activity by analyzing Script Block Logging (Event 4104), Module Logging (Event 4103), and process creation events. The analyst parses Windows Event Log EVTX files to detect obfuscated commands, AMSI bypass attempts, encoded payloads, credential dumping keywords, and suspicious download…