Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add mattmre/EVOKORE-MCP-PUBLIC --skill orch-panelgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mattmre/EVOKORE-MCP-PUBLICWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mattmre/evokore-mcp-public/orch-panel)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mattmre/evokore-mcp-public/orch-panel"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mattmre/evokore-mcp-public/orch-panel/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mattmre/evokore-mcp-public/orch-panel"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mattmre/evokore-mcp-public/orch-panel.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00023 | $0.01346 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00673 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00269 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00135 |
Grade A, and why
orch-panel scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 164 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
orch-panel — Panel of Experts Review
Purpose
Invoke a Panel of Experts review on any artifact. Assembles virtual expert personas with defined backgrounds, biases, and domain expertise to provide multi-perspective critical analysis that generic review misses.
Usage
orch-panel <panel-type> <artifact> [options]
Panel Types
| Panel | Use For |
|---|---|
code |
Code quality, patterns, bugs, refactoring |
repo |
External repo evaluation, content review, integration plans |
re |
Reverse engineering, binary triage, semantic recovery, debugger planning |
arch |
Architecture decisions, phase plans, strategic direction |
security |
Security review, threat modeling, compliance |
perf |
Performance analysis, scaling, operational readiness |
dx |
Developer experience, API design, tooling ergonomics |
test |
Test strategy, coverage quality, resilience |
docs |
Documentation accuracy, completeness, usability |
Options
| Option | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|
--quick |
Skip challenge phase (solo + converge only) | false |
--no-feasibility |
Skip feasibility gate | false |
--cascade <panels> |
Run multiple panels sequentially | — |
--mode <mode> |
Panel-specific mode (e.g., pre-ingestion, phase-plan) | auto |
Examples
Single Panel Review
orch-panel code src/SessionIsolation.ts
Context: Multi-tenant session isolation layer. In the hot path for every
tool call. Concerned about TTL check performance and LRU eviction correctness.
Quick Review (No Challenge Phase)
orch-panel security --quick src/auth/OAuthProvider.ts
Context: OAuth JWT validation for HTTP transport.
Cascading Multi-Panel Review
orch-panel --cascade arch,code,security docs/ECC-INTEGRATION-PLAN.md
Context: 9-phase integration plan. Want architecture review first,
then code feasibility, then security assessment. Unified feasibility at end.
Repo Ingestion Review
orch-panel repo --mode post-ingestion docs/ECC-INTEGRATION-PLAN.md
Context: This plan was generated from research agents analyzing an
upstream reference repo against our own codebase.
Review for accuracy, completeness, and integration quality.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 164 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A aafdab396804
orch-panel is a skill published in the GitHub repository mattmre/EVOKORE-MCP-PUBLIC (3 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 1,346 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-review
Reviews diffs by severity to produce actionable feedback.
code-review-architecture
Architecture-focused code review covering hexagonal boundary violations, DDD anti-patterns, CQRS misuse, and microservices coupling issues. Applied in addition to the language-specific review skill when architecture markers are detected. Invoked when reviewing hexagonal architectures, DDD patterns, or microservices…
code-review-php
Deep PHP-specific code review covering strict types, PHPStan compliance, PSR standards, domain modeling, and ORM boundary violations. Applied in addition to the generic code-review skill when PHP code is detected. Invoked when reviewing PHP PRs, Symfony/Laravel changes, or performing PHP-specific quality checks.
code-review-python
Deep Python-specific code review covering type annotations, async pitfalls, mutable defaults, threading safety, and domain modeling. Applied in addition to the generic code-review skill when Python code is detected. Invoked when reviewing Python PRs, Py changes, or performing Python-specific quality checks.
code-review-typescript
Deep TypeScript-specific code review covering type safety, ESM/CJS, async correctness, money precision, and domain modeling. Applied in addition to the generic code-review skill when TypeScript/JavaScript code is detected. Invoked when reviewing TS/JS PRs, TypeScript changes, or performing TypeScript-specific quality…
code-review
Orchestrates code review by detecting the project language and architecture, then routing to the appropriate specialized review skill (code-review-go, code-review-typescript, code-review-python, code-review-php, code-review-architecture). Falls back to the generic checklist when no specific skill applies. Invoked when…