Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Maudeunfledged834/startup-founder-skills --skill security-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Maudeunfledged834/startup-founder-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/maudeunfledged834/startup-founder-skills/security-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/maudeunfledged834/startup-founder-skills/security-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/maudeunfledged834/startup-founder-skills/security-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/maudeunfledged834/startup-founder-skills/security-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/maudeunfledged834/startup-founder-skills/security-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00050 | $0.01750 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00025 | $0.00875 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00350 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00175 |
Grade A, and why
security-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to security-review — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 152 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Security Review
When to Use
- The user wants a security audit of their application, infrastructure, or specific feature
- They need a threat model before launching or a penetration test preparation review
- They have a dependency vulnerability alert and need remediation guidance
- They are handling sensitive data (PII, payment, health) and need verification
- Code audit, secrets detection, or compliance assessment is requested
Context Required
From startup-context: tech stack, deployment environment, compliance requirements, data types. Also ask:
- Scope — Full app, feature, auth system, single PR, infrastructure, or cloud environment
- Data types — PII, payment, health, credentials, or other sensitive data handled
- Compliance requirements — SOC 2, HIPAA, PCI-DSS, GDPR, ISO 27001
- Authorization — Confirm written authorization exists before any active testing
Workflow
Follow a five-phase methodology. Automated scanning precedes manual review. Authorization verification is mandatory before active testing.
- Scope definition — Establish attack surface boundaries. Identify all components, data flows, and trust boundaries. Confirm authorization. Define in-scope and out-of-scope.
- Automated scanning — Execute tooling before manual review:
- SAST:
semgrep --config=autoacross the codebase - Dependency audit:
npm audit/pip-audit/govulncheck/trivy fs . - Secrets detection: Scan for hardcoded credentials, API keys, tokens in source
- Container scanning:
trivy imagefor containerized deployments - Record all automated findings for validation in the next phase.
- SAST:
- Manual code review — Conduct contextual analysis that automated tools miss:
- Authentication and authorization flow tracing end-to-end
- Business logic vulnerabilities (price manipulation, race conditions, privilege escalation)
- Data flow analysis for sensitive information (where does PII enter, transit, and persist?)
- STRIDE threat modeling against each component and data flow
- Validation and classification — Test findings and assign severity:
- Validate automated findings to eliminate false positives
- Assign CVSS v3.1 scores; assess exploitability in context
- Classify by business impact, not just technical severity
- Reporting — Document vulnerabilities with precise locations, business impact, and corrective actions. Deliver a prioritized remediation roadmap.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 152 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A b6c434d7ae90
security-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository Maudeunfledged834/startup-founder-skills (6 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 1,750 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to security-review, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
top-design
Create award-winning, immersive web experiences at the level of Awwwards-featured agencies. Use when the user mentions "Awwwards quality", "make my site stunning", "scroll animations", "parallax storytelling", "cinematic web design", "portfolio site", or "brand experience". Also trigger when elevating a standard…
traction-eos
Implement the Entrepreneurial Operating System (EOS) to align vision and execution across a company. Use when the user mentions "EOS", "Entrepreneurial Operating System", "V/TO", "quarterly rocks", "Level 10 meetings", "accountability chart", "IDS process", "my company feels chaotic", "we keep having the same…
create-site
Creates a new Power Pages code site (SPA) using React, Angular, Vue, or Astro. Guides through the full process from initial concept to deployed site: requirements discovery, scaffolding, component planning, design, implementation, validation, and deployment. Use when the user wants to create, build, or scaffold a new…
configure-env-variables
Configures environment variables for Power Pages site settings to support ALM across environments. Creates environment variable definitions in Dataverse, guides the user through linking site settings to those variables via the Power Pages Management app, adds the variables to the solution, and generates a…
create-business
Guided journey from raw idea to a validated, positioned, priced business with a chosen beachhead. Orchestrates ten skills phase by phase - jobs-to-be-done, mom-test, design-sprint, lean-startup, good-strategy-bad-strategy, blue-ocean-strategy, obviously-awesome, hundred-million-offers, monetizing-innovation…
influence-psychology
Apply the seven principles of ethical persuasion (reciprocity, commitment, social proof, authority, liking, scarcity, unity) to product design, copy, and sales. Use when the user mentions "social proof", "persuasive copy", "why users dont convert", "ethical persuasion", "reciprocity", "scarcity tactics", "commitment…