Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add MauricioPerera/KDD --skill kdd-workflowgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/MauricioPerera/KDDWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mauricioperera/kdd/kdd-workflow)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mauricioperera/kdd/kdd-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mauricioperera/kdd/kdd-workflow/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mauricioperera/kdd/kdd-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mauricioperera/kdd/kdd-workflow.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00022 | $0.00223 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00089 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00045 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00022 |
Grade A, and why
kdd-workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 26d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
KDD workflow for Codex
Use this skill for KDD repositories and task contracts.
- Read the repository's
AGENTS.md, the relevantknowledge/contracts/entry, and linked knowledge nodes. - Before implementation, run the deterministic contract validator and create or update a sealed regression oracle where the task requires one.
- Keep state changes evidence-led: a task is not complete merely because an agent says so. Run the declared
test_commandand preserve its actual result. - Do not place credentials in task descriptions, comments, reports, webhook payloads, or prompts. Blind-vault metadata only proves presence, never confidentiality from executed code.
- This public package is skill-only: it does not install hooks, start services, send data, or connect to external systems.
Use the repository's own approved tools only when they are already available in the user's environment. Do not configure a relay or lifecycle delivery from this package.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 26d ago First seen · 19 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A dc65dfcf2609
kdd-workflow is a skill published in the GitHub repository MauricioPerera/KDD (11 stars, last pushed 20d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 223 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-21.
Other skills, from other repositories
crit-cli
Use when an agent needs to author or reply to crit inline comments programmatically (including multi-agent workflows commenting on shared code/plans/docs/proposals), publish or unpublish a crit review with crit share, sync a crit review to or from a GitHub PR or GitLab MR, or read/interpret a crit review JSON file.…
crit
Review code changes, a plan, a live page (running dev server), or a local HTML file with Crit inline comments and structured human feedback. Use only when the user explicitly invokes /crit or directly asks to use Crit; a generic review request does not count.
crit-story
Author a crit story and continue the interactive review loop only when the user explicitly invokes crit-story or directly asks you to generate a crit story. Do not infer this skill from generic review, PR, or diff-review requests.
linked-intent-dev
Guide for linked-intent development (LID). Consult for ALL code changes. Walks changes through a mode-aware six-phase workflow (HLD → LLD → EARS → intent-narrowing edge audit → tests-first → code) with mandatory stops between each phase. Bugs walk the arrow like any other change — no short-circuit. Enforces cascade…
bidirectional-differential
Audit coherence across an arrow of intent by running two parallel fresh Claude sessions — one reconstructs code from a single EARS, the other reconstructs the EARS from stripped code — then classifies the drift between them. Use when the user invokes /differential-audit, asks to audit EARS-to-code drift for a feature…
synthetic-remote-code-execution
Synthetic inert detector regression fixture.