no-se-te-olvide-que

no-se-te-olvide-que is a skill for Claude Code from mcasillas17/mexican-mom. It costs 72 tokens per session (1,255 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A scope-control rule for requirements or problems that appear after work has already been agreed or started.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when a new requirement, issue, or discovered constraint arrives during implementation or after completion was claimed.
Why use it?
It prevents new requests from being silently absorbed into the current estimate and diff. Each item is identified as current work, follow-up work, or a blocker.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the mexican-mom plugin — 24 skills shipped together

Good fit Use it when a new requirement, issue, or discovered constraint arrives during implementation or after completion was claimed.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/mcasillas17/mexican-mom/no-se-te-olvide-que
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add mcasillas17/mexican-mom --skill no-se-te-olvide-que
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mcasillas17/mexican-mom

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install mexican-mom, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 24 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for no-se-te-olvide-que

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mcasillas17/mexican-mom/no-se-te-olvide-que/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mcasillas17/mexican-mom/no-se-te-olvide-que)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mcasillas17/mexican-mom/no-se-te-olvide-que"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mcasillas17/mexican-mom/no-se-te-olvide-que/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for no-se-te-olvide-que

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mcasillas17/mexican-mom/no-se-te-olvide-que"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mcasillas17/mexican-mom/no-se-te-olvide-que.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 72 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,255 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00072 $0.01255
Opus 5 $0.00036 $0.00628
Sonnet 5 $0.00014 $0.00251
Haiku 4.5 $0.00007 $0.00126

Measured 12d ago against content hash b6667fe0b9f3, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

no-se-te-olvide-que scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/no-se-te-olvide-que/SKILL.md · 94 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 94 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Ah, y no se te olvide que

Something new just arrived. It does not get to walk in without being named.

Rule

Anything that shows up after the scope was set is new scope, and new scope gets said out loud before it gets worked on. Name it in one sentence, then classify it as exactly one of three — never two, never none.

Class What it means What you must do
IN It belongs to the current work Say why it belongs, say what it changes about the plan or the estimate, then do it
FOLLOW-UP Real, but separate work Record it durably — see ahorita for what a real commitment requires — and say you recorded it
BLOCKER It invalidates work already done or in flight Stop. Say what is now wrong and what has to be revisited before anything else proceeds

Never silently absorb it. Quietly folding "one small thing" into work in progress is how a two-hour change becomes three days: the estimate you gave is now false, the diff is now larger than what was agreed, and the user does not know the scope moved because nobody told them. The absorbing is the failure, not the extra work.

This applies to scope you discover, not only scope the user hands you. If you find a second bug while fixing the first, if a file you touched turns out to need a migration, if a test reveals an unrelated break — that is late-arriving scope and it gets the same sentence and the same classification. Self-inflicted scope creep counts.

If completion was already claimed, IN means re-verification. Taking new work in after "done" makes the previous evidence stale — it described a codebase that no longer exists. Say so explicitly and run a-ver-ensename again. Do not let the old proof cover the new change.

Procedure

  1. Notice the arrival. The tells: a requirement stated after you started, a constraint nobody mentioned during planning, an issue you tripped over, or anything following the words "also," "one more thing," or "while you're in there."
  2. State it as new scope in one sentence. Literally say that it is new — "that is new scope relative to what we agreed" — before you say anything about doing it.
  3. Classify it IN, FOLLOW-UP, or BLOCKER. If you cannot tell, ask; an unclassified addition defaults to absorbed, which is the one outcome this skill forbids.
  4. Act on the class.
    • IN — say what it changes about the estimate or the plan, then do it.
    • FOLLOW-UP — record it where it will be seen, and say where.
    • BLOCKER — stop and surface it; do not continue building on invalidated work.
  5. Re-verify if you had already claimed completion. New evidence for the new state.

Read the full file on GitHub · 94 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 94 lines · 72 tokens per session scan A b6667fe0b9f3

Subscribe to this mod's changes

no-se-te-olvide-que is a skill published in the GitHub repository mcasillas17/mexican-mom (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 72 tokens to every session and 1,255 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.