Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/mckruz/claude-code-sdlc/api-pattern-nodenpx skills add MCKRUZ/claude-code-sdlc --skill api-pattern-nodegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/MCKRUZ/claude-code-sdlcWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00108 | $0.00939 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00054 | $0.00469 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00188 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00094 |
Grade A, and why
api-pattern-node scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 66 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
API pattern — Node / TypeScript
Consistency is the point: the same kind of work looks the same everywhere, so the reviewer and the
next agent read it without re-learning. You do not invent structure — you locate the codebase's
canonical example and replicate it. The layering, type, and error conventions behind this skill are
in .claude/rules/project-structure.md.
Node has no single blessed framework, so this skill has no framework opinion to impose. Whether this repo is express, fastify, hono, or nest is a question you ANSWER BY READING IT, never one you answer from habit. If you catch yourself writing an express handler because express is what you have seen most, stop — you skipped step 1.
Procedure
-
Find the canonical example. If the spec names one under "Reuse this pattern," read it. Otherwise grep for the nearest sibling of the same shape and pick the most recent, most-tested one — not the oldest. Useful anchors:
- the router/registration surface:
Grepfor\.(get|post|put|patch|delete)\(orroute( - the app's composition root:
GrepforcreateApp,buildServer,register( - a validator:
Grepfor the schema library the repo actually imports (zod,valibot,typebox,@sinclair/…) —Greppackage.jsonfirst to learn which one exists here - a use case + its port interfaces, and the adapter implementing them
- the sibling
*.test.ts— the test IS part of the pattern
- the router/registration surface:
-
Extract the pattern, don't paraphrase it. Note, from the example:
- Layering — route/controller → use case → port → adapter. Which file each piece lives in.
- Request/response types — inferred from the schema, or hand-written? Readonly surfaces?
- Validation — where the parse happens (middleware vs the handler's first lines) and how the inferred type flows inward. It happens at the boundary, exactly once.
- Error model —
Result<T, E>returned, or thrown-and-caught by an error middleware? Which one this repo does, not which one you prefer. - Wiring — how the new surface becomes reachable: a container registration, a route table, a barrel file, a plugin. This is the step that is easiest to forget and silently does nothing.
- Logging — the injected logger, its name, its structured fields.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 66 lines · 108 tokens per session scan A 0211889d5e8e
api-pattern-node is a skill published in the GitHub repository MCKRUZ/claude-code-sdlc (4 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 108 tokens to every session and 939 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
agent-host-chat-contributions
Build and review cross-cutting agent-host chat behavior through lifecycle contributions. Use when adding turn lifecycle side effects, prompt or context injection, restored-history transformation, protocol-action observation, or when reviewing changes that add code to AgentSideEffects or AgentService.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.