Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add mcp-dir/anvisa_processo-mcp --skill anvisa_processo-mcpgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mcp-dir/anvisa_processo-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mcp-dir/anvisa_processo-mcp/anvisa_processo-mcp)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mcp-dir/anvisa_processo-mcp/anvisa_processo-mcp"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mcp-dir/anvisa_processo-mcp/anvisa_processo-mcp/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mcp-dir/anvisa_processo-mcp/anvisa_processo-mcp"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mcp-dir/anvisa_processo-mcp/anvisa_processo-mcp.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00100 | $0.00628 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00050 | $0.00314 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00126 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00063 |
Grade A, and why
anvisa_processo-mcp scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
curl -X POST https://api.mcp.ai/api/anvisa_processo/consultar \ What it actually says
ANVISA: Processo — REST API skill
Você tem acesso à ANVISA: Processo REST API na MCP.AI.
ANVISA: Processo, consulta em fonte oficial. Hospedado pela plataforma, sem credenciais da plataforma, pague por consulta com crédito pré-pago.
Base URL
https://api.mcp.ai/api/anvisa_processo
Todo endpoint é um POST na Base URL + o path abaixo. Os parâmetros vão no corpo JSON.
Autenticação
Inclua em toda request:
Authorization: Bearer sk_live_...
Content-Type: application/json
Gere sua chave em https://app.mcp.ai/settings/api-keys (workspace API key
sk_live_…, não expira, revogável). Uma única chave serve pra todos os seus MCPs.
Formato de resposta
{ "ok": true, "tool": "<tool_id>", "result": <payload> }
Exemplo cURL
curl -X POST https://api.mcp.ai/api/anvisa_processo/consultar \
-H "Authorization: Bearer sk_live_..." \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{}'
Reportar problemas
Se um endpoint retornar erro, vazio ou dado inesperado, reporte (não desista calado): POST /api/anvisa_processo/report com { "message": "...", "context"?: "...", "conversation"?: [...] }. Isso notifica o time da MCP.AI.
Endpoints (1)
anvisa_processo_consultar
ANVISA: Processo, consulta em fonte oficial. (POST /api/anvisa_processo/consultar)
| Parâmetro | Tipo | Obrigatório | Descrição |
|---|---|---|---|
protocolo |
string | Não | Parâmetro de consulta "protocolo". |
numero_processo |
string | Não | Parâmetro de consulta "numero_processo". |
expediente |
string | Não | Parâmetro de consulta "expediente". |
Este MCP também funciona via conexão MCP (Claude / Cursor) em https://api.mcp.ai/p_anvisa_processo — veja o README. A skill acima é pra consumir a REST API direto (agente próprio / código).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 65 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A c1203f3ad7ba
anvisa_processo-mcp is a skill published in the GitHub repository mcp-dir/anvisa_processo-mcp (0 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 100 tokens to every session and 628 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…