Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add me2resh/apexyard --skill accessibility-auditgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/me2resh/apexyardWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/me2resh/apexyard/accessibility-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/me2resh/apexyard/accessibility-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/me2resh/apexyard/accessibility-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/me2resh/apexyard/accessibility-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/me2resh/apexyard/accessibility-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.01543 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00617 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00309 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00154 |
Grade A, and why
accessibility-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 22d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 123 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Writing: read docs/skills/shared/writing-rule.md before you write a durable artifact.
/accessibility-audit — WCAG 2.2 AA Compliance
Deep-dive accessibility analysis against the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.2 Level AA. Produces a prioritized findings list with fix instructions. Invoke when /launch-check's accessibility row shows WARN or FAIL, or proactively for any user-facing app.
WCAG Principles (POUR)
| Principle | What it means | Key checks |
|---|---|---|
| Perceivable | Content must be presentable in ways users can perceive | Alt text, captions, color contrast, text resizing |
| Operable | Interface must be navigable and usable | Keyboard access, focus management, skip links, timing |
| Understandable | Content and UI must be understandable | Language declaration, consistent navigation, error identification |
| Robust | Content must work across assistive technologies | Valid HTML, ARIA usage, semantic elements |
Process
Step 1: Scan for structural issues
Grep the codebase for common accessibility failures:
<imgwithoutaltattribute<inputwithout associated<label>oraria-labelonClickwithoutonKeyDown/onKeyPress(keyboard inaccessible)<div>or<span>used as buttons withoutrole="button"andtabIndex- Missing
<html lang="...">attribute - Heading hierarchy gaps (h1 → h3 with no h2)
- Missing
<main>,<nav>,<header>,<footer>landmarks - Color values with insufficient contrast ratios (check theme files / CSS variables)
- Missing skip-to-content link
- Auto-playing media without controls
- Forms without error identification (
aria-invalid,aria-describedby)
Step 2: Check ARIA usage
aria-labelon interactive elements without visible textaria-hidden="true"not applied to decorative elementsroleattributes used correctly (notrole="button"on a<div>that should be a<button>)- Live regions (
aria-live) for dynamic content updates aria-expanded/aria-controlson expandable sections
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 22d ago Changed · -2 lines 7df7ec349f2e
- 1mo ago Changed · +4 lines 69af1d0d8141
- 2mo ago First seen · 121 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A db7d9540455c
accessibility-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository me2resh/apexyard (542 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 1,543 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
accessibility-audit compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| accessibility-auditme2resh/apexyard | Skill | 542 | yesterday | MIT | A | 34 | Claude Code |
| aesthetic-instrumentavelikiy/great_cto | Skill | 112 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 106 | Claude Code |
| committed-aestheticavelikiy/great_cto | Skill | 112 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 94 | Claude Code |
| anydesignavelikiy/great_cto | Skill | 112 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 214 | Claude Code |
| swiftui-design-consultationParetofilm/superpowers-gstack | Skill | 3 | 2d ago | none | A | 50 | Claude Code |
| apple-native-reviewParetofilm/superpowers-gstack | Skill | 3 | 2d ago | none | A | 59 | Claude Code |
| swiftui-view-gateParetofilm/superpowers-gstack | Skill | 3 | 2d ago | none | A | 39 | Claude Code |