codify-rule

A process for turning a bug found during code review into a draft rule for the project's handbook. It asks for approval and records which pull request and reviewer prompted the rule.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it after a reviewer catches a problem that the main review process missed, so the lesson can be proposed as a reusable handbook entry.
Why use it?
It helps the team preserve lessons from missed issues without adding rules automatically or without human review.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/me2resh/apexyard/codify-rule
Any agent
npx skills add me2resh/apexyard --skill codify-rule
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/me2resh/apexyard

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 33 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 4,333 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00033 $0.04333
Opus 5 $0.00016 $0.02167
Sonnet 5 $0.00007 $0.00867
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00433

Measured 3d ago against content hash 6c8574fbc070, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

codify-rule scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.

The scan reads SKILL.md. This mod also ships 1 executable file (tests/smoke.sh), listed below but not scanned — reading those needs a real analyzer, not pattern matching.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/skills/codify-rule/SKILL.md · 441 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 441 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

/codify-rule — Codify a Rex-Miss Into a Handbook Entry

When a human reviewer (or Copilot, or any second-pass review) catches a bug Rex missed, run /codify-rule to turn that review comment into a draft handbook entry. The handbook layer then compounds on Rex's actual misses rather than only the rules an operator thought to write proactively.

The skill is operator-curated, not auto-promoted: every captured rule is previewed in full and gated on a Y/N approval before any file is written. The output file includes a _Source:_ footer naming the PR + comment author + date so future readers can find the original miss this rule came from.

Path resolution

This skill writes to the handbooks/ tree (or <private_repo>/custom-handbooks/ for split-portfolio adopters). Source the helper at the top of any bash block that touches those paths:

source "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)/.claude/hooks/_lib-read-config.sh"
source "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)/.claude/hooks/_lib-portfolio-paths.sh"
public_handbooks_root="$(_portfolio_root)/handbooks"
private_handbooks_root=$(portfolio_custom_handbooks_dir)

portfolio_custom_handbooks_dir returns <ops_root>/custom-handbooks by default for single-fork adopters; split-portfolio v2 adopters resolve to <private_repo>/custom-handbooks via the portfolio.custom_handbooks_dir config key. See docs/multi-project.md § "Private custom skills + handbooks".

Usage

/codify-rule
/codify-rule --pr 296
/codify-rule https://github.com/me2resh/apexyard/pull/296#discussion_r123456789
/codify-rule --blocking
/codify-rule --pr 296 --blocking

Process

1. Resolve the source PR

Three input paths, tried in order:

  1. Full GitHub PR-comment URL in $ARGUMENTS (e.g. https://github.com/me2resh/apexyard/pull/296#discussion_r123456789) — parse the owner/repo, PR number, and comment ID; fetch the comment body via gh api.
  2. --pr <N> in $ARGUMENTS — use that PR number; resolve owner/repo from the current git remote (gh repo view --json nameWithOwner).
  3. Otherwise — find the open PR for the current branch via gh pr view --json number,headRefName,headRepository. If no open PR, ask:

Read the full file on GitHub · 441 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 3d ago First seen · 441 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A 6c8574fbc070

Subscribe to this mod's changes

codify-rule is a skill published in the GitHub repository me2resh/apexyard (497 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 4,333 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

brainstorming

You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.

obra/superpowers · 37 tokens

auto-perf-optimize

Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.

microsoft/vscode · 62 tokens

chat-perf

Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.

microsoft/vscode · 51 tokens

chat-pet-sprite-creation

Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.

microsoft/vscode · 53 tokens

cpu-profile-analysis

Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…

microsoft/vscode · 71 tokens