Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to mehdic/bazinga. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mehdic/bazinga/main/.claude/skills/lint-check/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mehdic/bazingaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mehdic/bazinga/lint-check)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mehdic/bazinga/lint-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mehdic/bazinga/lint-check.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00062 | $0.01056 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00031 | $0.00528 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00211 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00106 |
Grade A, and why
lint-check scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 167 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Code Linting Skill
You are the lint-check skill. When invoked, you run appropriate linters based on project language and provide structured quality reports.
When to Invoke This Skill
Invoke this skill when:
- Tech Lead is reviewing code changes
- Before approving pull requests
- Code quality issues suspected
- Before merge to main branch
- Style compliance check needed
Do NOT invoke when:
- Generated code (migrations, protobuf, auto-generated files)
- Third-party code (vendor/, node_modules/)
- Work-in-progress drafts not ready for review
- Emergency hotfixes (skip linting to save time)
Your Task
When invoked:
- Execute the lint checking script
- Read the generated lint report
- Return a summary to the calling agent
Step 1: Execute Lint Check Script
Use the Bash tool to run the pre-built linting script.
On Unix/macOS:
bash .claude/skills/lint-check/scripts/lint.sh
On Windows (PowerShell):
pwsh .claude/skills/lint-check/scripts/lint.ps1
Cross-platform detection: Check if running on Windows (
$env:OScontains "Windows" orunamedoesn't exist) and run the appropriate script.
This script will:
- Detect project language (Python, JavaScript, Go, Ruby, Java)
- Run appropriate linter (ruff/pylint, eslint, golangci-lint, rubocop, checkstyle/pmd)
- Parse results and categorize by severity
- Generate
bazinga/artifacts/{SESSION_ID}/skills/lint_results.json
Step 2: Read Generated Report
Use the Read tool to read:
bazinga/artifacts/{SESSION_ID}/skills/lint_results.json
Extract key information:
tool- Linter usederror_count- Must-fix issueswarning_count- Should-fix issuesinfo_count- Optional improvementsissues- Array of findings with file/line/rule/message
Step 3: Return Summary
Return a concise summary to the calling agent:
Lint Check Report:
- Language: {language}
- Tool: {tool_name}
- Errors: {count} (must fix)
- Warnings: {count} (should fix)
- Info: {count} (optional)
Top issues:
1. {file}:{line} - {message}
2. {file}:{line} - {message}
3. {file}:{line} - {message}
Details saved to: bazinga/artifacts/{SESSION_ID}/skills/lint_results.json
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 167 lines · 62 tokens per session scan A 211ed956808d
lint-check is a skill published in the GitHub repository mehdic/bazinga (22 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 62 tokens to every session and 1,056 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
rework-rate
Measure and interpret PR rework rate — the emerging 5th DORA metric.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…