Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add melaya-labs/melaya-mcp --skill cto-fix-deploy-verify-loopgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/melaya-labs/melaya-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/melaya-labs/melaya-mcp/cto-fix-deploy-verify-loop)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/melaya-labs/melaya-mcp/cto-fix-deploy-verify-loop"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/melaya-labs/melaya-mcp/cto-fix-deploy-verify-loop/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/melaya-labs/melaya-mcp/cto-fix-deploy-verify-loop"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/melaya-labs/melaya-mcp/cto-fix-deploy-verify-loop.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.01179 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00472 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00236 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00118 |
Grade A, and why
cto-fix-deploy-verify-loop scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 56 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Monitor, fix, deploy, verify loop
Keep the loop whole so no fix is called done until the error count says so. Each step has its own skill; this one sequences them.
Look up first
- Your charter objectives in context (for example a post-deploy check window) and
excom_recallfor past loops on this error. - Monitoring and CI access:
grafana_*andjenkins_*(or your equivalents). Missing app:excom_request_setup. Coding grant off: ask the owner withexcom_send_handoff(kind question). Never fake a step. - The deploy runbook and the team's known-issues note:
excom_knowledge_search"deploy runbook", "known issues". If the deploy runbook is missing, stop before deploying and ask the owner withexcom_propose_task(needs decision true).
Steps
- Orient: read the alert payload, then
excom_read_tasksfor an open task on the same error. - Monitor:
grafana_errors_summaryfor the window, and the tool-call failure telemetry when the team has it (failure rate per surface, per connector and per tool, top failing tools, degraded runs). Pick one error or one failing tool, the one with the most customer impact, not the loudest. - Evidence:
grafana_error_contexton that message. For a failing tool, read its failed calls: the tool, its error class and its code location (the source file and line its telemetry names, or the team's tool-to-module map), and start reading the code there. Find the root cause with skill cto-incident-root-cause. No root cause hypothesis, no loop. - Task:
excom_propose_taskcarrying the evidence (service, errors, logs, query, first seen, last seen, count, source). - Fix:
excom_code_taskwith repository, one-line goal, governing runbook and evidence, including the failing file for a tool (record write, asks under Prepare). The session reproduces with a test and reports evidence addressed and the covering test. Commit messages follow the repository's own convention: read the recent history first. Follow skill cto-coding-session-hygiene. - Review and push: skill cto-push-review-gate;
excom_code_pushbranch (send), then base (production, always asks). - Deploy: skill cto-jenkins-safe-deploy, only the jobs the diff needs, in the runbook's order, one job at a time: start one,
jenkins_wait_builduntil it finishes, and start the next only when it is green. On red, readjenkins_build_consoleand stop. - Mark:
grafana_create_annotationwith commit and build (record write). - Verify:
grafana_errors_summarywith a window that starts after the build finished and ends now. The fixed message must not appear after the deploy; for a tool, its failure rate after the deploy must be below the rate before it. Allow at least 30 minutes of normal traffic, or the alert's usual recurrence interval, before calling it stopped. - If it persists or a new error appeared, say so on the task, gather new evidence, start a new session. Never mark done on a deploy alone.
- Close:
excom_record_measurement(count before and after, windows),excom_update_taskwith receipts, and a known-issues entry drafted withexcom_save_draftwhen the cause is reusable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 56 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A da508de5bdb5
cto-fix-deploy-verify-loop is a skill published in the GitHub repository melaya-labs/melaya-mcp (1 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,179 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-11-12.
cto-fix-deploy-verify-loop compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cto-fix-deploy-verify-loopmelaya-labs/melaya-mcp | Skill | 1 | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| helmdeck-debugtosin2013/helmdeck | Skill | 6 | 1mo ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 93 | Claude Code, Codex |
| workflow-failure-triagegithub/github-mcp-server | Skill | 34k | yesterday | MIT | A | 69 | Claude Code, Codex |
| xcodebuildmcp-cligetsentry/XcodeBuildMCP | Skill | 6.6k | 2d ago | MIT | A | 48 | Claude Code, Codex |
| opik-explaincomet-ml/opik-mcp | Skill | 226 | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 113 | Claude Code |
| ssh-incidentbvisible/mcp-ssh-manager | Skill | 543 | today | MIT | A | 46 | Claude Code, Codex |
| triaging-incidentsjschuller/mcp-server-servicenow | Skill | 27 | yesterday | MIT | A | 89 | Claude Code |