Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add meleantonio/awesome-econ-ai-stuff --skill techdebtgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/meleantonio/awesome-econ-ai-stuffWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/meleantonio/awesome-econ-ai-stuff/techdebt)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/meleantonio/awesome-econ-ai-stuff/techdebt"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/meleantonio/awesome-econ-ai-stuff/techdebt/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/meleantonio/awesome-econ-ai-stuff/techdebt"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/meleantonio/awesome-econ-ai-stuff/techdebt.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00033 | $0.00527 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00264 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00105 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00053 |
Grade A, and why
techdebt scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 91 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A e3d4b0ae17d5
techdebt is a skill published in the GitHub repository meleantonio/awesome-econ-ai-stuff (625 stars, last pushed 9d ago), with no licence file. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 527 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
techdebt
Find and fix technical debt including duplicated code, dead code, outdated patterns, and code smells. Run at the end of sessions to clean up.
techdebt
Find and fix technical debt including duplicated code, dead code, outdated patterns, and code smells. Run at the end of sessions to clean up.
software-code-refactoring
Improve production code quality while preserving all existing test behavior. Commonly used for the Refactor phase of TDD red-green-refactor, but applicable to any codebase with tests. Use when production code works but needs cleanup — reducing duplication, improving naming, simplifying complexity, aligning with…
simplify-codebase
Simplification audit or authorized codebase simplification whose stated objective is to remove accidental complexity. Use for evidence-backed deletion or consolidation of dead code, duplicate state, redundant APIs or layers, ownerless abstractions, obsolete compatibility or design records, and over-engineering in any…
refactoring-workflow
Improve the structure of existing code without changing its behaviour, in small verified steps under a green test suite. Use when the user asks to refactor, clean up, restructure or simplify code, wants to reduce duplication or coupling, is preparing a codebase for a feature it cannot currently accommodate, or when…
code-quality-review
A code-review guide for judging whether software stays easy to understand, change, test, and extend.